Date
1 - 4 of 4
Invitation to Participate: Hyperledger Security Process Task Force
|
Hello all, As many of you already know, a "Hyperledger Security Process Task Force" was proposed in the recent TSC meeting. This is an invitation to join and collaborate on these efforts. Bring in your project team members, any and every feedback will add value. More participation will lead us to defining inclusive governance. I will send a follow up email and a zoom invitation to further facilitate these discussions. But here is a good starting point for you all. Proposed Zoom meeting: Either Friday, 10th December 2021 or Monday, 13th December 2021 1. Review the document proposed by Ry https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TF/Gaps+between+guidance+and+implementation+for+CSVD 2. Replay the TSC meeting https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2021+11+18+TSC+Meeting+Record 3. Survey & feedback from project teams. Hart, Arnaud, Artem your presence will be great and you are all de facto nominated to the task force :) . Regards, Arun
|
|
|
|
Artem Barger
Hi, Either day works for me fine. Will you send a calendar invite? Best regards, Artem Barger.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:49 PM Arun S M <arun.s.m.cse@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Hello all, The first meeting is on 13th December 2021, Monday at 8:00 AM PDT | 4:00 PM GMT. An invite will be sent on the TSC and maintainers mailing lists. Looking forward to seeing you all there. Zoom details & agenda: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TF/2021-12-13+Meeting+Minutes Regards, Arun
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:19 AM Arun .S.M. <arun.s.m.cse@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Hello all, Thank you for participating in the first Hyperledger Security Process Task Force meeting. Please find the meeting minutes at https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TF/2021-12-13+Meeting+Minutes Looking forward to seeing you all in the next task force meeting and/or TSC meetings (first week of January, an invite for it will be sent closer to the schedule). Regards, Arun
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:32 AM Arun S M via lists.hyperledger.org <arun.s.m.cse=gmail.com@...> wrote:
|
|
|