You and your April Fool's Day jokes, Gari :-) Jonathan ----- To Network with Networks https://unbounded.network

Oh, that’s great Jayakar ! My (independent) advice for working out a project proposal for the TSC is to try to think/find potential projects (existing HL projects) that will be useful/helpful/benefici

Dear Jayakar, Is this the same Cobol registry that you wrote here in September 28, built on proprietary infrastructure/software and non-open-source stuff that makes people pay to connect to that App I

Dear Jayakar, First, just to say that I believe that the Hyperledger TSC mailing list may not be the best mailing list for such a call for partnerships - especially during TSC Election days. However,

#cal-invite #cal-notice #tsc #tsc-project-update #tsc-wg-update

Precisely! Thank you Ry. Jonathan https://linkedin.com/in/levitate HACERA https://hacera.com

Also, the Fabric 2.0-alpha (release branch) was out in April 2019, beta in December 2019, etc. v2.0.0-alpha - April 9, 2019 v2.0.0-beta - December 12, 2019 v2.0.0 - January 29, 2020 v2.0.1 - February

Hi Brian, Yes, I saw and we follow the 4 contributors. I highly respect the attempts/work. Here https://lfanalytics.io/projects/hyperledger%2Fexplorer/dashboard And, here, https://github.com/hyperledg

Just took a look at the backlog. Are people still thinking of not killing the Hyperledger Explorer project? Or are others planning to make it Active any time soon? https://github.com/hyperledger/block

With BTC halving near, are we looking at the same pay for half the meetings? :-) Joking! I think this makes sense. Especially as not many/all meetings require voting. It may help focusing on decision

It will be Great Again [TM] if people/mobile phone stop sending these invites/meeting Accepted/Rejected/Tentative - to the entire mailing list. We could possibly put together a filter… but we really s

Hi everybody, While I am obviously in support of this proposal, being the first sponsor in the list after Consensys, I have had a LOT of conversations about this "move" and I hope tgat today Goes Well

Many thanks for blazingly quick turnaround time here Ry ! Jonathan https://unbounded.network

So I figured. Sure thing, Tim. Take your time… better to do it a bit more slowly but surely. Some (other, of course) open source projects don’t always make it THAT easy to upgrade, or at least, less e

Hi Vipin, I tried to start and end the email without taking sides. See the ending paragraph below: Sounds like having a clear criteria from the TSC and evaluating whether Iroha meets it, will be the m

One moment pls. I thought that the whole argument/discussion was/is regarding whether the "active" status was justified... or whether the project should get back to "incubation". That's what Dave, Chr

Nikolai... did you mean to CC the entire mailing lists? I always found Ry to be super responsive. Just engage directly... not sure there is a need for emails of this nature. Unless there is another is

Since nobody sleeps in this project ;-), just a quick one: let’s choose whether it’s “Financial Markets” or “Capital Markets”… If people thought that the Supply Chain attracted interest, I am sure tha

Thanks Chris, >> Seems to me that the process for a build should be in the control of the project's maintainers, not LFIT. ^^^ I agree and I used to believe that this was indeed the case. I see. Didn'

Adding the HL Fabric team, in case there are new issues that I was not aware of. Jonathan Levi HACERA - To Blockchain with Confidence https://hacera.com

Hi everybody, This is really great - thanks. 1. Just to confirm, the issues with the Fabric CI/CD were resolved (at least the stuff I have expressed in the quotes thread, well before the latest HL Fab