|
[Hyperledger Project TSC] Whitepaper Update
Hi Everyone, I’ve attached the most recent version of the whitepaper, which is updated with all of the suggestions and comments people have provided over the past two weeks. Alternatively, you can get
Hi Everyone, I’ve attached the most recent version of the whitepaper, which is updated with all of the suggestions and comments people have provided over the past two weeks. Alternatively, you can get
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1256
·
|
|
[Hyperledger Project TSC] Whitepaper Update
Hi Chris, Thanks for the comments. 1. I’ll fix the DLT expansion (although this is something the technical writer would probably catch and fix) 2. Would someone from Quilt be willing to write a projec
Hi Chris, Thanks for the comments. 1. I’ll fix the DLT expansion (although this is something the technical writer would probably catch and fix) 2. Would someone from Quilt be willing to write a projec
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1259
·
|
|
[Hyperledger Project TSC] 2 EMAIL VOTES NEEDED / Whitepaper + Training & Education WG
+1 to both for me as well. Thanks, Hart
+1 to both for me as well. Thanks, Hart
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1268
·
|
|
[Hyperledger Project TSC] Update on releasing Fabric security audit report
+1 Thanks Dave!
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1307
·
|
|
[Hyperledger Project TSC] [Email Vote Requested] Hyperledger Labs Proposal
+1. Thanks everyone!
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1337
·
|
|
authorization to publish the sawtooth security audit report
+1. It’s a good idea to publish these (as long as there aren’t outstanding issues). Thanks, Hart
+1. It’s a good idea to publish these (as long as there aren’t outstanding issues). Thanks, Hart
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1392
·
|
|
Research topics on Hyperledger Frameworks
Hi Marta, I think we have a lot of researchers already working in/on Hyperledger stuff. Would it make sense to have some sort of informal group (or at least a rocket chat channel) on blockchain relate
Hi Marta, I think we have a lot of researchers already working in/on Hyperledger stuff. Would it make sense to have some sort of informal group (or at least a rocket chat channel) on blockchain relate
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1403
·
|
|
graduation from incubator before a software release 1.0?
On a scale of 0-3, I would say I'm about an e. More seriously though, I agree with Dan that I think in most cases it should be required. The one corner case that bugs me is very small-scale, well-main
On a scale of 0-3, I would say I'm about an e. More seriously though, I agree with Dan that I think in most cases it should be required. The one corner case that bugs me is very small-scale, well-main
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1411
·
|
|
Requirements WG Discussion
Hi Everyone, To continue the discussion about the requirements working group from the meeting this morning: One of the main points in favor of having the working group remain (I think brought up by Br
Hi Everyone, To continue the discussion about the requirements working group from the meeting this morning: One of the main points in favor of having the working group remain (I think brought up by Br
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1427
·
|
|
Whitepaper Update
Hi Everyone, I wanted to provide a brief update on the whitepaper—we’re almost done! We’re instituting a “content freeze” next week where we will only allow fixes that 1) don’t need approval or 2) are
Hi Everyone, I wanted to provide a brief update on the whitepaper—we’re almost done! We’re instituting a “content freeze” next week where we will only allow fixes that 1) don’t need approval or 2) are
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1458
·
|
|
Public Sector WG
+1 from me (sorry for the late reply). Hart
+1 from me (sorry for the late reply). Hart
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1479
·
|
|
Hackfests
There are a lot of good suggestions in this thread. I think Todd and Mic have done an excellent job of summarizing the problem and proposing solutions. We do probably need multiple types of events, be
There are a lot of good suggestions in this thread. I think Todd and Mic have done an excellent job of summarizing the problem and proposing solutions. We do probably need multiple types of events, be
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1491
·
|
|
Hyperledger Global Forum (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] canceling tomorrow's TSC call)
Hi Brian, I’d also be interested in hearing what you all (i.e. the event planners) are interested in us talking about. I think most of us are fairly flexible and would rather see the event succeed tha
Hi Brian, I’d also be interested in hearing what you all (i.e. the event planners) are interested in us talking about. I think most of us are fairly flexible and would rather see the event succeed tha
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1521
·
|
|
Minutes / September 13th, 2018
Hi Everyone, I said this briefly in the call yesterday, but I’d like to reiterate it here. I was really hoping this working group/task force/lab/whatever would become about “community improvement” rat
Hi Everyone, I said this briefly in the call yesterday, but I’d like to reiterate it here. I was really hoping this working group/task force/lab/whatever would become about “community improvement” rat
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1664
·
|
|
technical implications of the EEA arrangement ?
I’m curious as well about how the transparency and openness requirements of Hyperledger will mesh with the restrictive model of the EEA. And, as Bob points out, who is allowed to join EEA meetings fro
I’m curious as well about how the transparency and openness requirements of Hyperledger will mesh with the restrictive model of the EEA. And, as Bob points out, who is allowed to join EEA meetings fro
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1720
·
|
|
Proposal: Extend the list of lab sponsors to the Hyperledger staff
+1 as well.
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1730
·
|
|
Project Proposal: Supply Chain
I don’t think the technical merit of the proposed project is in doubt. Building an interoperable, supply chain-focused blockchain platform is certainly a worthy goal (would anyone here disagree?) and
I don’t think the technical merit of the proposed project is in doubt. Building an interoperable, supply chain-focused blockchain platform is certainly a worthy goal (would anyone here disagree?) and
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1764
·
|
|
crypto-lib Project Incubation Proposal (Formally Coming Soon)
Hi Everyone, At the crypto-lib meeting yesterday, we (the Hyperledger crypto-lib community) decided that we were finally ready to start the process of applying for project incubation status. As such,
Hi Everyone, At the crypto-lib meeting yesterday, we (the Hyperledger crypto-lib community) decided that we were finally ready to start the process of applying for project incubation status. As such,
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1779
·
|
|
Minutes / October 18th, 2018
+1 to this. I have frustrated a number of business people when they have asked about future plans for Fabric and I have sent them the link to the jira. It’s great for technical folks, but suboptimal f
+1 to this. I have frustrated a number of business people when they have asked about future plans for Fabric and I have sent them the link to the jira. It’s great for technical folks, but suboptimal f
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1781
·
|
|
crypto-lib Proposal Update
Hi Everyone, First of all, thank you all for the feedback during and after the TSC meeting last week. It was good to hear suggestions from people, particularly those that are open source veterans. We
Hi Everyone, First of all, thank you all for the feedback during and after the TSC meeting last week. It was good to hear suggestions from people, particularly those that are open source veterans. We
|
By
Hart Montgomery
· #1814
·
|