Hi Chris, excellent paper ! Below two remarks / questions around Identity Management vs Consensus and one suggestion concerning data privacy on permissioned blockchains. Interested in anyone's view. r

Hi Fabian, I would hope for an architecture where a blockchain stores more than letters of intent but implements somewhat more binding and automated smart contracts. Agree with the necessity of Identi

ok, get your point ! indeed, without turing complete machines, things look different. Two questions: 1. How will you then have binding smart scripts ? You basically 'only secure' the data on the block

Is design and usecases from digital assets available, maybe we can share a link here ? regards groet gruss Benedikt

Here an interesting interview, also on permissioned Blockchains in general. Links in some respects to a question (point 2 below) raised below https://medium.com/institute-for-the-future/bitcoin-is-the

Hi there Here an interesting interview, also on permissioned Blockchains in general. Links in some respects to a question (point 2 below) raised below https://medium.com/institute-for-the-future/bitco