toc@lists.hyperledger.org

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Thanks Cheers, Christopher Ferris IBM Fellow, CTO Open Technology email: chrisfer@... twitter: @christo4ferris blog: https://developer.ibm.com/code/author/chrisfer/ IBM Open Source white paper:

By Christopher Ferris <chrisfer@...> · #2551 ·

Re: Hyperledger Besu Proposal is Live

Hello list, Others will be aware that as a maintainer of Hyperledger Burrow - 'the Ethereum project' of Hyperledger - that we are likely to be most affected by the accession of Pantheon/Besu into

By Silas Davis · #2550 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Hi, The SIG chairs provide a couple of sentences every month which we then convert into slides for the GB. Additionally they do proper reports and updates on quarterly basis. These started when TSC

By Marta Piekarska <mpiekarska@...> · #2549 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Chris, I think it is quarterly. Some of the SIGs are brand new so they dont have any updates yet like the CMSIG. There should be updates from Telecomm, Supplychain, Healthcare and Trade

By VIPIN BHARATHAN · #2548 ·

Re: [External] Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Hi, Chris. I believe those “quarterly reports” are from when the SIGs originally fell under the TSC purview. Tracy From: <tsc@...> on behalf of Christopher Ferris

By Kuhrt, Tracy A. · #2547 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Brian wrote: "SIGs are expected to provide a one-presentation-deck-page report each month on their activities and accomplishments, which is provided to the Governing Board for their

By Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@...> · #2546 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Brian wrote: "Creation of any new working group should partially be gated by whether it's reasonable to expect most of the projects to be able to have people actively following

By Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@...> · #2545 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Brian Thanks for the clear and concise descriptions. I know that sometimes the lines get blurred a bit, but its good to see things spelled out clearly. Would it possible to share the SIG Update slide

By mark wagner <mwagner@...> · #2544 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

I also want to highlight this link: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/TSC+Election+2019. And believe most working group/team members are project contributor at the same time. Thanks! -- Best

By Baohua Yang · #2543 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

Hi, Thanks to Brian for bringing the charter into the discussion. I had forgotten about this fragment which was used to add WG participants into the electorate, all those years ago. Brian's quote from

By Vipin Bharathan · #2542 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Just to reiterate as SIGs are under the gov board right now, there is an open action within the board to define more prescriptive practices. I hope that the outcome will be that the sigs produce

By Middleton, Dan <dan.middleton@...> · #2541 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

On 8/15/19 11:40 AM, hmontgomery@... wrote: It was something we've worked out with SIG chairs when transitioning from TSC oversight to GB/HL staff oversight; and yes, not

By Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...> · #2540 ·

Re: SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Hi Brian, Thanks for the response. I’m preparing a post on WGs that I’ll make later today on the wiki that should hopefully address the WG concerns here. I like your description of the

By hmontgomery@us.fujitsu.com <hmontgomery@...> · #2539 ·

SIGs vs WGs (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.)

Changing the subject to address a point in Hart's earlier email: On 8/15/19 8:17 AM, hmontgomery@... wrote: I sincerely hope this is not the reason why one

By Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...> · #2538 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

SIGs aren't "represented on the TSC", but nor are Working Groups or any particular projects. This isn't a House of Representatives nor a Senate. TSC members are elected by voters

By Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...> · #2537 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

Hi Arnaud, Thanks for the clarification, and sorry I misinterpreted your original emails. Your argument makes complete sense. Do you think we should roll the SIG status into the discussion

By hmontgomery@us.fujitsu.com <hmontgomery@...> · #2536 ·

Hyperledger Mentorship/Internship Program Update August 2019

The expanded internship/mentorship program this year has seen tremendous contributions from the mentees and mentors. You can learn more about their work by: reading about the 17 project goals,

By Min Yu · #2535 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

Thanks for this interestinginfo but to be clear, I for one never said that SIGs aren't doing any technicalwork. My only point is that SIGs don't report to the TSC. And until thischanges, I think it'd

By Arnaud Le Hors · #2534 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

Hi Arnaud, This is a little bit orthogonal to what you and Vipin are discussing, but it’s still relevant, so I’ll mention it here. I think a lot of people are, in fact, using SIGs for

By hmontgomery@us.fujitsu.com <hmontgomery@...> · #2533 ·

Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.

Hi Vipin, The facts arethat while WGs and projects are under the governance of the TSC, and reportto them, the SIGs don't. My point is thatif the SIGs are actually doing technical work that should be

By Arnaud Le Hors · #2532 ·

Messages