Hello, It is unfortunate that you have deprecated composer toolchain. With the increasing number of frameworks, shall we also assume deprecation of some frameworks as well? We can see most frameworks

I plan on a new, public git repo with the data that I have available once the election concludes. -- Ry Jones Community Architect, Hyperledger Chat: @rjones

Hi everybody, While I am obviously in support of this proposal, being the first sponsor in the list after Consensys, I have had a LOT of conversations about this "move" and I hope tgat today Goes Well

Hi Ry/Brian, In the interests of transparency, the final turnout should be released. Also tracking this during the election and nudging people to vote will increase the turnout. Voter apathy is a real

The page that you vote on says: This has caused confusion. I cannot see your specific ballots; the email says: Here is what I see in the UI, which makes this more clear: I only know in aggregate how

Thanks, Lynn and Sam. I’ve updated the agenda with the link. Note we have a very full agenda this week and may not verbally review the project updates. TSC members will review them offline

Sam Curren has posted the Aries Q3 Update for review: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+Q3+Hyperledger+Aries

You cannot use your old ballot urls - you should get new ones today. Please read the nomination statements and vote! https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+Nomination+Statements -- Ry

Hi Simon, Dan, and Caroline, We will put this up for ratification at this week's TSC meeting. I do think this is a healthy sign of a mature open source organization - that we are actively managing

Hello, It's been a whole year since the IBM team contributing to Composer moved to focus on Fabric. Dan Selman, the other maintainer, has been focusing on smart legal contracts under the Accord

Brian Very interesting. Leaving aside legal niceties can we rebadge ourselves as the Hyperledger Foundation? After all these years I still struggle when saying we are members of the Hyperledger ... I

The Continuous Delivery Foundation, http://cd.foundation/ (yes that's a real URL, stunned me too, didn't realize that TLD was active!) has been having a very similar conversation to our own:

https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+08+22+TSC+Minutes With that, I believe we are all caught up on the minutes. Cheers! Dave --- David Huseby Security Maven, Hyperledger The Linux

https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+07+25+TSC+Minutes Dave --- David Huseby Security Maven, Hyperledger The Linux Foundation +1-206-234-2392 dhuseby@...

You're all welcome! I want to point out that one more nominee reached out and asked to be removed from the list. https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+Nomination+Statements Ry -- Ry

Hi all, I find myselflargely in agreement with the sentiment expressed by Shawn and Chris. Ifind it rather unfortunate that attempts to understand how Besu will fitin and what its addition means to be

I linked to this thread... easier than cutting and pasting different comments. Cheers, Christopher Ferris IBM Fellow, CTO Open Technology email: chrisfer@... twitter: @christo4ferris blog:

Agreed - thanks, Ry! I would also note that it is indeed an impressive list. I am really pleased that there is so much interest! I also think that this makes clear that we should, indeed, expand

can i suggest that the working group comments be moved to the page where we are trying to capture all of these discussions? the role of wg's is really not relevant to the besu proposal

Many thanks for blazingly quick turnaround time here Ry ! Jonathan https://unbounded.network