As this work is going more deeper and collaborative, I would like to have detailed discussions on this, before posting for presentations. Interested may start comment on this to improve this

Thank you all forcontributing to the discussion. I think the case for Transact to continueas is has been clearly made. I will note that the quarterly project reportsare the main means of communication

+1 on Arun entire recap I believe the entire issue needs a start with Arun’s excellent suggestion: Frankly I am on the outside looking in. I see a lot of projects that are each going their own way.

Hello all, Hope this email finds you well, Hyperledger India Chapter is planning on organizing the Hyperledger technologies deep-dives. What is it? There is huge interest in the community to learn

Brian, Arnaud and Shawn, I am amazed looking at the way this email conversation is going on. Here is what I see happening in the thread. It is still the community having healthy discussion. But wrong

James +1 I can confirm that the Sawtooth 2.0 architecture conversations have been very constructive and people have been willing to adapt the design to accommodate our and others requirements. Given

Danno +1 Best Duncan -- Duncan Johnston-Watt CEO, BTP Twitter: @duncanjw Mob: +44 777 190 2653 LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt

A number of them actually do have the "money." The next issue they run into is engineering resources: there is a limited supply of engineers that are (a) good enough (b) willing to work in

On 9/4/20 11:49 AM, Shawn Amundson wrote: To be clear, it wasn't a statement about Transact as a project - I went out of my way to note that there is a healthy development clip

Brian and Arnaud, Without emotion into to it, these things take a while to gestate. I think that Transact is maturing now so that it can be used as a solid external component. Iroha is enquiring

Hi Shawn, While I understandyour emotional response I think it's important to keep it to facts. Inwhat way has the TSC been disruptive to date?? The TSC isn't trying tokill anything. At best it is

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 4:03 AM Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan@...> wrote: ... My 2c is that given the variety of top level DLTs within the Hyperledger community and their very different architectures

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:35 AM Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...> wrote: ... But then... that enthusiasm seemed to fizzle. Like any such collaborative process, it can be awfully hard

Brian/All This is definitely something we should talk about next week. My 2c is that given the variety of top level DLTs within the Hyperledger community and their very different architectures it is

In Rocketchat, Shawn Amundson had this to say about the "Rollover of projects tied to a single other project" proposal: Shawn is right. Conversations that try to address subjective

Cancelled: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 10 September 2020 7:00am to 8:00am (UTC-07:00) America/Los

The 2020 Q3 Hyperledger Grid update is available at https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020+Q3+Hyperledger+Grid Thank you, Andrea Gunderson

Hi all, The agenda forthis week is online: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020-09-03+TSC+Agenda We have a significantnumber of reports that have come in and need to be reviewed with one

Hi, I wanted to join these discussion threads for a while now, and feel like this is a best topic to start on. The proposal looks good and in my opinion, this is a solution to the aftermath problem. I

Hereby a Hyperledger Project is proposed to the Hyperledger Foundation for implementing. This project is mainly focused to procure IP Addresses for the Units of 'Digital Cluster Control Nodes (DCCN)'