Hi All, Thanks for the thoughtful questions. We've responded to them below. Virgil’s Question: Why the name "Besu"? That seems an odd choice, I'd imagine you'd want to pick an Ethereum-related

Team, The 2019 Q3 Hyperledger Grid quarterly update is now available for review. Here is the link: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/2019+Q3+Hyperledger+Grid Thanks, -Mark

Hyperledger technologies support a permissioned blockchain. They do not, at least to my understanding, have a crypto aspect. Is the intent to incubate Besu as a permissioned ethereum based blockchain

Why the name "Besu"? That seems an odd choice, I'd imagine you'd want to pick an Ethereum-related word like "Rainbow", "Unicorn", or some such. -V

There were some trademark issues around "Pantheon", unfortunately Dan O'Prey CMO & Head of Community / +1 646 647 5957 Digital Asset, creators of DAML This message, and any attachments, is for the

+1 (non-binding) -- Duncan Johnston-Watt CEO, Blockchain Technology Partners +44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw

Why rename it? On 8/8/19 11:23:12, grace.hartley@... wrote:

Hello, I have just posted Trusted Compute Framework (TCF) Project Proposal for the review and discussion. Regards, Eugene Yarmosh yevgeniy.y.yarmosh@...

Thanks Cheers, Christopher Ferris IBM Fellow, CTO Open Technology email: chrisfer@... twitter: @christo4ferris blog: https://developer.ibm.com/code/author/chrisfer/ IBM Open Source white paper:

Hello list, Others will be aware that as a maintainer of Hyperledger Burrow - 'the Ethereum project' of Hyperledger - that we are likely to be most affected by the accession of Pantheon/Besu into

Hi, The SIG chairs provide a couple of sentences every month which we then convert into slides for the GB. Additionally they do proper reports and updates on quarterly basis. These started when TSC

Chris, I think it is quarterly. Some of the SIGs are brand new so they dont have any updates yet like the CMSIG. There should be updates from Telecomm, Supplychain, Healthcare and Trade

Hi, Chris. I believe those “quarterly reports” are from when the SIGs originally fell under the TSC purview. Tracy From: <tsc@...> on behalf of Christopher Ferris

Brian wrote: "SIGs are expected to provide a one-presentation-deck-page report each month on their activities and accomplishments, which is provided to the Governing Board for their

Brian wrote: "Creation of any new working group should partially be gated by whether it's reasonable to expect most of the projects to be able to have people actively following

Brian Thanks for the clear and concise descriptions. I know that sometimes the lines get blurred a bit, but its good to see things spelled out clearly. Would it possible to share the SIG Update slide

I also want to highlight this link: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/HYP/TSC+Election+2019. And believe most working group/team members are project contributor at the same time. Thanks! -- Best

Hi, Thanks to Brian for bringing the charter into the discussion. I had forgotten about this fragment which was used to add WG participants into the electorate, all those years ago. Brian's quote from

Just to reiterate as SIGs are under the gov board right now, there is an open action within the board to define more prescriptive practices. I hope that the outcome will be that the sigs produce

On 8/15/19 11:40 AM, hmontgomery@... wrote: It was something we've worked out with SIG chairs when transitioning from TSC oversight to GB/HL staff oversight; and yes, not