I emailed the Fabric maintainers and gave them a week to object to the release of the report. No objections were expressed. At the TSC's earliest convenience, I would like a quick vote--just to go by

Dear TSC The monthly report for TWGC can be found at wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/twgc/report/2017-12. Please feel free to have a look, and welcome for any advice! More about TWG China can be found at

Dear everyone Enjoy holidays! Look forward to having a nice new year! -- Best wishes! Baohua Yang

All, A few people have already sent regrets, and quorum will be a challenge. So, we’ll cancel TSC calls for 12/21 and 12/28. Enjoy the holidays and we’ll see you next year! Cheers, Christopher

Oh, one more thing:I propose we just called these hyperledger labs rather than hyperledgerlabs projects. The revised text reflects that. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Web &

Hi all, Following up onlast week's discussion I took another pass at the draft and invite youto have another look and comment. The main changesare: - the additionof a section on motivation, - an

Dear all We just had the group meeting this morning. The minutes is available at https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/twgc/meeting/2017-12-20. We are calling for speakers/sponsors for Meetups in Jan

I have plenty of space in Downtown DC, and I can work with Gilles Hilary over at Georgetown University and the DC meetup group to put something together for the 2018 hackfest. Kyle Sent from my

Hyperledger Project Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting December 14, 2017 (7:00am - 8:00am PT) via GoToMeeting TSC Members Arnaud Le Hors Yes Baohua Yang Yes Binh

Chris, thanks for the clarification on licensing. That does sound usefully different. Likewise, Arnaud, thanks for those clarifications on intent. Brian further began to distinguish between the

FYI: cancelling 12/28 TSC meeting since many on holiday 2018 Hackfest planning [reminder thread] February - US [TBD] April - Tel Aviv, Dubai, Japan? [TBD] If you have potential venue space, please

Hello all, The Identity WG Call is at 12 noon EST, the 13th of December, the call is completely open, anyone can participate. Join the call: https://www.uberconference.com/hyperledger-community

There are no more outstanding bugs that were reported as part of the Fabric 1.0 security audit. Also, I am being asked by people to see the security audit. It was always my intention to release the

Hello all, I support the concept of the Labs for the following reasons: We are an umbrella organisation to shelter developments that are Open Source dealing with Blockchain. Of course the

That feels like a different conceptualization of this, as Labs is allowed to be a home for projects that aren't intended to go through the formal path to becoming a regular project, whereas projects

How about adding one more state in Project Lifecycle, and have it called “Inception”?

+1. -- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chair, Advisory Board | Cloudsoft Corporation +44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw

I agree. My only comment in terms of the proposal itself was to highlight upfront the requirement that anything started in labs is ASL2.0 licensed (and cannot be arbitrarily deleted). Best -- Duncan

To the question of "how is this not just github"? I think that the reasonable distinction is that the governance of Hyperledger Labs follows the IP requirements of Hyperledger (ASL2.0 and CCBY4.0) and

This looks great! Thanks for putting together the proposal! Two questions… First, is there an expectation that a project proceed to incubation (or “die”)? That is… do you expect projects