Agree with the feeling of Quilt. While better not use "lattice", as it already has special meaning in math and crypto areas. -- Best wishes! Baohua Yang

I kind of like Hyperledger QuILT - the ILT could be "Interledger Transaction" Chris

I am thinking of words that describe joining rope ends together with more of an integral connection than a bulky knot such as interweave or braid. There are also pretty knots such as Carrick, etc.

Seems the naming attracts lots of discussions (again) -:) Let's summarize the latest result besides the original interledger.java one: * Hyperledger ILP * Hyperledger Nexus * Hyperledger Quilt *

I like Quilt. It's too bad there aren't many words where "ILP" occur in a simple way, but QuILt can at least contain IL. Or to weave Java into it... Hyperledger Jill? But I like where this is

+1 Hyperledger ILP From: hyperledger-tsc-bounces@... [mailto:hyperledger-tsc-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Adrian Hope-Bailie via hyperledger-tsc Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 17:01 To: Dan

I'm tending more and more toward something passive like Quilt :)

Blockstream have a product called Liquid, so I'd suggest avoiding that -- Dan O'Prey Chief Marketing Officer c: +1 646-647-5957 e: dan@...  Digital Asset Holdings, LLC 96 Spring Street, 7th

I like Hyperledger Connect (we have two primary roles in Interledger which we call ledgers and connectors) but appreciate the ambiguity outside of payments. Is "Connector" different enough? i.e.

In the identity space "connect" and "connections" have very different connotations around linking identities, rather than cross ledger value transfer (which inter-ledger better conveys, but has the

I like "Hyperledger Connect". Jim Zhang STSM, Blockchain IBM Cloud Durham, NC, U.S.A. Tel: 919-254-8587

Agreed. I wouldn't like the implementation language on the top level project name either. We could have that on the sub-project name if we end up with multiple implementations. If we entertain new

> there may well be other interoperability style projects in the future e.g., Lightning Network and others, so tying the name to what it is, a specific implementation of the Interledger protocol is

Some input from the marketing side for your consideration: Agree with concerns about using trademarks not owned by HL/LF but am a fan of being as specific as possible as there may well be other

Hyperledger Nexus

Thanks Brian, that's useful context. I think positioning this project simply as: A project focused on creating interoperability between "value networks" is a good approach. Here I define a value

Hi Everyone, How about an 'umbrella' style name proposition for "Interledger.Java"? It is primarily an 'Blockchain Integration' technology platform, utilizing the (trademarked) Interledger protocol

Interledger.Java is a fine alternative to Interledger-Java. All Hyperledger projects formally have "Hyperledger" in front of them, so that for example when the press or someone

Hyperledger Project Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting September 7, 2017 (7:00am - 8:00am PT) via GoToMeeting TSC Members Arnaud Le Hors Yes Baohua Yang Yes Binh

Hi Adrian, I agree with you. It sounds better as Interledger.Java The reason why I added the "Hyperledger" word was that Brian suggested that it should be clearly distinguished from the W3C