|
A project proposal to Hyperledger Foundation
#tsc-project-update
#tsc-wg-update
#tsc
Jayakar <Jayakar_J_Joseph@...>
Hereby a Hyperledger Project is proposed to the Hyperledger Foundation for implementing. This project is mainly focused to procure IP Addresses for the Units of 'Digital Cluster Control Nodes (DCCN)' with cluster of 'Digitizable Healthcare-centres (DHC)', to the Blockchain of Hyperledger during their registrations. These units to be deployed around the Globe for every 3 to 10 Healthcare Centres, for a 'Global Digital Corona Virus Harmful Mutation Control Program' that on proposal with UN. Expecting interested partners to collaborate on this under the Umbrella of Hyperledger Foundation.
|
|
|
|
Accepted: Technical Steering Committee (TSC)
Simon Stone <sstone1@...>
|
|
|
|
Re: Rollover of projects tied to a single other project (was Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020)
Arnaud Le Hors
Hi Hart,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I think that makes sense. As I said on our last call, I would also expect the TSC to talk to the maintainers of the project before making any decision for that matter. I have now drafted a proposal which states that explicitly. I invite everyone to check it out and comment: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/Rollover+of+projects+tied+to+a+single+other+project Regards. I hope everything is fine with you too. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM From: "hmontgomery@..." <hmontgomery@...> To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...>, "Technical Steering Committee (TSC)" <tsc@...> Date: 08/27/2020 11:48 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020 Sent by: tsc@... Hi Everyone, If we are going to continue the discussion on projects that end up being tied to a single framework (which it looks like people wanted to do), can we (as a TSC) formally solicit the opinion of the maintainers of those projects? In the discussions we've had so far (well, at least in this iteration of the extended "subprojects" debate) we haven't heard from anyone who is a maintainer in these projects. It would be nice to hear the reasons why they are independent projects, and why they want to stay that way (assuming they do--but maybe they don't; for instance, if the "parent" project doesn't want them). This would give us a lot of perspective on this issue, as I think none of the "home" projects of any of the TSC members are any of the projects we've discussed as one of these "tied to a single framework" projects. What does everyone think about this? If there is still momentum for this discussion (and the vote last week seemed to indicate that there was, even accounting for the "coffee" voters), I think it would be useful to decide on a list of projects that we consider falling into this category, and then asking what the maintainers of those projects think. I hope everyone is doing OK in these difficult times. Thanks for your time, and have a great day. Thanks, Hart
From: tsc@...
<tsc@...> on behalf of Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 11:37 PM To: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) <tsc@...> Subject: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020 Hi all, We only have one agenda item so if anyone wants to add anything please go ahead. In any case, I'd like to continue the discussion we started last week with regard to how we manage projects that end up being tied to a single framework. https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020-08-20+TSC+Agenda Please, note that several quarterly reports are due. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Re: TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020
hmontgomery@us.fujitsu.com <hmontgomery@...>
Hi Everyone,
If we are going to continue the discussion on projects that end up being tied to a single framework (which it looks like people wanted to do), can we (as a TSC) formally solicit the opinion of the maintainers of those projects? In the discussions we've had
so far (well, at least in this iteration of the extended "subprojects" debate) we haven't heard from anyone who is a maintainer in these projects. It would be nice to hear the reasons why they are independent projects, and why they want to stay that way (assuming
they do--but maybe they don't; for instance, if the "parent" project doesn't want them). This would give us a lot of perspective on this issue, as I think none of the "home" projects of any of the TSC members are any of the projects we've discussed as one
of these "tied to a single framework" projects.
What does everyone think about this? If there is still momentum for this discussion (and the vote last week seemed to indicate that there was, even accounting for the "coffee" voters), I think it would be useful to decide on a list of projects that we consider
falling into this category, and then asking what the maintainers of those projects think.
I hope everyone is doing OK in these difficult times. Thanks for your time, and have a great day.
Thanks,
Hart
From: tsc@... <tsc@...> on behalf of Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 11:37 PM To: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) <tsc@...> Subject: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020 Hi all,
We only have one agenda item so if anyone wants to add anything please go ahead. In any case, I'd like to continue the discussion we started last week with regard to how we manage projects that end up being tied to a single framework. https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020-08-20+TSC+Agenda Please, note that several quarterly reports are due. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Looking for a sponsor for our project - EasyDoser for HyperledgerLabs
Hi all, Hope you are doing well. Me and Abhimanyu have been working on a project: EasyDoser. This eases endorsement operations for hyperledger based products. We would like to promote our project into hyperledgerLabs and we are in the process of looking for a sponsor.
This is currently a mentorship project which just finished 2nd (out of 4) checkpoint. This means, from timeline point of view, we are half way through. Some description and project plan about the project is available here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=29035323
The proposal for hyperledgerLabs is already made and available as pull request here: https://github.com/hyperledger-labs/hyperledger-labs.github.io/pull/145 From the implementation standpoint, we have a
bare minimum ReactJS frontend talking to hyperledger Fabric network via golang api server. The pull request contains pictures which gives a glimpse of how backend and frontend looks. Currently the code repository is private in github, we can share if someone is interested in taking a look. The project status is checked and planned every week.
Looking forward for your support,
Thanks, - Anoop
|
|
|
|
Accepted: Technical Steering Committee (TSC)
Angelo De Caro
|
|
|
|
Cancelled Event: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) - Thursday, 27 August 2020
#cal-cancelled
tsc@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <tsc@...>
Cancelled: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) This event has been cancelled. When: Where: Organizer: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) community-architects@... Description:
|
|
|
|
Aug 27, 2020 TSC call canceled
Arnaud Le Hors
Let's plan on having
a call next week.
Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Re: Any reason not to cancel the TSC call of Aug 27, 2020?
Gari Singh
+1 In any case, I have some conflicts this week as well so likely will not be able to attend.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:35 AM Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...> wrote: Hi all,
|
|
|
|
Any reason not to cancel the TSC call of Aug 27, 2020?
Arnaud Le Hors
Hi all,
I haven't had a chance to work on a proposal for the project reorg policy and have nothing else for this week's agenda. Unless anyone has anything they need this call for I suggest we cancel it. Please, let me know. Thanks.. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Friday Fun
Middleton, Dan <dan.middleton@...>
Netflix has this https://g.co/kgs/kXCCRn Rubik’s cube documentary which is of nerdly interest, and kind of piqued my interest this week.
That documentary doesn’t deal with anything mathematical, but Rubik’s cubes can be represented as mathematical groups. Groups are used a lot in cryptography. This TEDed video, though, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW2Hvs5WaRY actually makes a connection instead with music. If you haven’t been introduced to groups before, I think this ~4 min. rendering with Rubik’s cubes and music is a lot more fun and accessible than text book definitions.
However, if you do want something a little more formal, this is a high school level text on Rubik’s cubes + groups. http://people.math.harvard.edu/~jjchen/docs/Group%20Theory%20and%20the%20Rubik's%20Cube.pdf I’m only half way thru and so far it’s group theory with Rubik’s cube examples. I was kind of hoping for something with some “AHA!” about solving a Rubik’s cube based on understanding the math. Or given some state find an easy inversion… sort of the discrete log of the rubik’s cube world. If anyone finds something like that I’d be interested.
Happy Friday, Dan
|
|
|
|
Editing your LFID profile
Hi, I mentioned on the last call that a profile editing tool exists for LFID now. Take a look! You can also edit your registered emails, which in the future, will help with stuff like TSC elections and the like.
|
|
|
|
TSC Agenda for Aug 20, 2020
Arnaud Le Hors
Hi all,
We only have one agenda item so if anyone wants to add anything please go ahead. In any case, I'd like to continue the discussion we started last week with regard to how we manage projects that end up being tied to a single framework. https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020-08-20+TSC+Agenda Please, note that several quarterly reports are due. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Identity WG call tomorrow at noon EDT
Vipin Bharathan
Hi Everyone, Meeting on the zoom channel is https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community When: Noon EDT on August 19, 2020 (16:00 UTC) Main Event : Presentation on TrustID by Maria Teresa Nieto Galan. Blockchain Specialist at Telefónica. Abstract: TrustID was created to decentralize the Hyperledger Fabric identity for the product implemented in Telefonica, TrustOS. TrustID is now an independent project. TrustID eases the management of identities for the case of TrustOS. Users shouldn’t need to hold a different set of credentials for each network or decentralized application they interact with. The same credentials used to access your own Bitcoins and manage your tokens in Ethereum should let you update the state of a Fabric asset or launch a secondary market in TrustOS. This is the rationale behind TrustID. The main goal of TrustID as a new project released in the Hyperledger Labs, under open source license, is to develop a new identity management standard in different blockchain platforms, regardless of the underlying technology. Meeting Notes and Agenda in one. https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/IWG/2020-08-19 Please participate. Vipin
|
|
|
|
TSC agenda for Aug 13, 2020
Arnaud Le Hors
Now available online:
https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/2020-08-13+TSC+Agenda Thanks to all who submitted the quarterly reports for their projects. We're only missing Burrow's at this point. Talk to you then. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
2020 Q3 Hyperledger Transact
Andrea Gunderson
The quarterly update for Transact is available at: Thanks, Andrea Gunderson
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets SIG call this Wednesday (the 12th) at 10 am EDT
Hi all,
Details of the call are at https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/CMSIG/2020-08-12
https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community.backup
|
|
|
|
Cancelled Event: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) - Thursday, 6 August 2020
#cal-cancelled
tsc@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <tsc@...>
Cancelled: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) This event has been cancelled. When: Where: Organizer: Technical Steering Committee (TSC) community-architects@... Description:
|
|
|
|
Re: TSC call this week?
Arnaud Le Hors
Given the lack of
response, consider this week's call canceled for good. I do want to encourage
TSC members to look at the election plan and if you're fine with it please
say so in the comments.
Thanks. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM From: "Arnaud Le Hors" <lehors@...> To: "Technical Steering Committee (TSC)" <tsc@...> Date: 08/05/2020 07:11 AM Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Hyperledger TSC] TSC call this week? Sent by: tsc@... Hi all, The execution plan for this year's election is being polished on the wiki and I invite everyone to have a look and comment on the page: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/TSC/TSC+Election+2020-2021 I'd be happy to hold this week's call if anyone wants to discuss this and/or has anything else they'd like to bring up but otherwise I propose to cancel this week's call. We can finalize the election plan offline or on next week's call. Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM
|
|
|
|
Identity Working Group call, minutes, recordings and other assets
Vipin Bharathan
Hi all, Thanks to Rebecca Aspler from Unbound for the excellent presentation on IoT devices and securing them using MPC. All recordings (video and audio are on the page), and the presentation itself is available as links from the page. Next week we will have an MPC presentation through the lens of Capital Markets, and of course the Blockchain also by Rebecca and her team. Please contribute to the minutes if you attended. My thanks to @clive boulton for updating the meeting Vipin
|
|
|
