Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Minutes 02.11.16
Jesus Diaz Vico <jesus.diaz.vico@...>
Hi all. Thanks for the email, it is very useful for all of us who could not attend the complete meeting (or attend at all). One doubt/comment about the evaluation criteria. Is privacy being considered as part of the security criteria (or any other criteria, although I'd say that it fits better in security, if any) or not at all? If not being considered either explicitly nor implicitly, I'll give it a thought. A system may be really secure (in terms of confidentiality (!= privacy), integrity, availability and so on) against any kind of considered attacker, but still lack privacy. In the concrete context of blockchain, as in most other contexts, a proposal may be privacy-respectful depending on the use case For instance, private "enough" for conventional value transactions, but not private enough for managing information storage. Best, Jesus
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Todd Benzies via hyperledger-tsc <hyperledger-tsc@...> wrote:
--
Jesús Díaz Vico
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|