Re: TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions.
Arnaud,
Feelings are not what I am after, but facts. Elsewhere in my email, it was pointed out that SIGs have large, diverse memberships and are very technical in nature. These folks are not protocol(dlt) engineers but bring a technical
user perspective. As we are maturing, we need that insight in our tsc, if we are to spur adoption and address usability and a path to production. For example the healthcare SIG has 1000 members in its mailing list. We should not exclude this contributor constituency
from our tsc eligibility pools and our rolls.
This will also enhance our DCI metrics. May I remind you that the last I stands for inclusion.
Vipin
From: tsc@... <tsc@...> on behalf of Arnaud Le Hors via Lists.Hyperledger.Org <lehors=us.ibm.com@...>
Vipin,Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 4:38 PM To: Vipin Bharathan Cc: tsc@... Subject: Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions. I'm sorry if my email made you feel I had ignored that part of your email. I hadn't but, I don't share your point of view and my point remains. Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM From: "Vipin Bharathan" <vipinsun@...> To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...> Cc: Hyperledger List <tsc@...> Date: 08/14/2019 06:25 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions. Sent by: tsc@... Arnaud, I had already addressed this question in my proposal: I quote
Vipin On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:54 AM Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...> wrote: The problem is that SIGs have been placed outside the governance of the TSC so it seems odd to have them sit on a board they have no direct relationship with. Am I the only one to feel that way? -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Blockchain & Web Open Technologies - IBM From: "Vipin Bharathan" <vipinsun@...> To: Hyperledger List <tsc@...> Date: 08/10/2019 08:54 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Hyperledger TSC] TSC elections: electorate should include SIGs and some other suggestions. Sent by: tsc@... Hi all, As a long time observer, contributor and participant in Hyperledger, I make the following comments about the TSC election process.
To increase the transparency of the election process, please include the percentage of electors who voted, the votes garnered by each of the candidates as in a general election. There have been suggestions that doing this may compromise the standing of candidates who got in with the least number of votes. Once elected (or nominated) to the TSC, each vote is worth the same. In light of many of the suggestions already made, it might be wise to delay the election slightly (as Hart and some of the others have already pointed out) We have the issue of Enterprises of widely different sizes collaborating on Hyperledger. Alternate forms of choice could be considered for the next election including quadratic voting and other methods, otherwise we risk losing diversity and the voice of smaller teams and groups. Best, Vipin
|
|