Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Hyperledger Explorer Proposal

Middleton, Dan <dan.middleton@...>

Per our discussion in the TSC meeting today…

Sawtooth validators expose rest endpoints that an explorer like this one could consume.

Here’s the web api:


We have some open discussion for the next meeting on how we want to approach a unified Hyperledger explorer vs. ledger-specific explorers.  This could be an interesting first case for showing ledger interaction among the Hyperledger family of blockchains.






From: hyperledger-tsc-bounces@... [mailto:hyperledger-tsc-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Brian Behlendorf via hyperledger-tsc
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 06:09
To: hyperledger-tsc@...
Subject: Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Hyperledger Explorer Proposal


I like this.  It also sounds like there may be a similar offering from IBM, detaching their Bluemix-based console from Bluemix and making it stand-alone.  Can I suggest that both efforts be combined into a new project, in a repository separate from the main Fabric repository (and thus able to set their own commiter base, release schedule, etc) combining the best of both?  That would help create a diverse developer community from the start, as well.


On 07/13/2016 02:04 PM, Konrad Pabjan via hyperledger-tsc wrote:

Hi everyone,

I have submitted a Hyperledger Improvement proposal to TSC, to be discussed in the meeting tomorrow. The proposal is currently on the Wiki page. Would love any feedback. I have a quick demo on my github that you can check out. (The video is really fast, had to get in under 25Mb)

Thank You,
Konrad Pabjan

hyperledger-tsc mailing list

Brian Behlendorf
Executive Director at the Hyperledger Project
Twitter: @brianbehlendorf

Join to automatically receive all group messages.