Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Survey on Code of Conduct Preferences


Arnaud Le Hors
 

I didn't see any response to my email. Additional votes were cast and there is now a clearer preference for the W3C-based draft. I therefore suggest the TSC endorses the W3C-based draft as our starting point and invite suggestions on how to improve on it.

In particular, one person voted "Strongly disagree with the W3C option" and I'd like to hear why. Otherwise, is there anything anyone would like to see changed or added, possibly from the CF-based one?

Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Cloud




From:        Arnaud Le Hors via hyperledger-tsc <hyperledger-tsc@...>
To:        Dave Neary <dneary@...>
Cc:        technical-discuss@..., tsc@...
Date:        03/14/2016 09:46 AM
Subject:        Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Survey on Code of Conduct Preferences
Sent by:        hyperledger-tsc-bounces@...




Thanks Dave for a good reminder of the goal of this effort. I assume everybody joined the project to work on blockchain rather than CoCs so let's not spend more time than necessary on this. :-)

To that end, I would appreciate if those who have voted strongly against either proposal explain what makes the proposal unacceptable to them and what it would take to change that. We'v got to be able to tweak one or the other to have something we can all live with. That's all we need.


Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Cloud





From:        
Dave Neary via hyperledger-tsc <hyperledger-tsc@...>
To:        
Michael Dolan <mdolan@...>, tsc@..., technical-discuss@...
Date:        
03/13/2016 01:15 PM
Subject:        
Re: [Hyperledger Project TSC] Survey on Code of Conduct Preferences
Sent by:        
hyperledger-tsc-bounces@...




Hi,

For what it's worth, my experience is that having a code of conduct at
all is a significant positive step. Communities can spend a lot of time
debating the relative benefits of approaches, terms, etc. The only vital
thing, in my opinion, is a clear path to remediation when there is a
complaint.

In the end, this will be a no-op for over 90% of the community. The
small (hopefully) number of community members of our community who
encounter poor behaviour will have recourse, and the reassurance that
good behaviour is something that the comunity values. For these people,
the code of conduct materially improves their community experience.

The only people who will be potentially negatively impacted by the code
of conduct will be those who behave poorly. And frankly, I am OK with that.

So I encourage the swift adoption of either, and I don't really mind which.

Thanks,
Dave.


On 03/11/2016 06:53 PM, Michael Dolan via hyperledger-tsc wrote:
> Just a quick update on the Code of Conduct. It appears with 47 voters
> participating, we have a near even split between the two options. At
> least one participant chose not to vote for one of the other on the 3rd
> question, so we’re also in a dead tie at 23 votes each for both options.
>
> I’m not sure this offers a clear path forward, but the good news is that
> either option appears to be acceptable by more than 90% of the
> community. I’ll leave the voting open, but this is where things stand as
> of now.
>
> Results are visible here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-BHZY7NXW/
>
> — Mike
>
> ---
> Mike Dolan
> VP of Strategic Programs
> The Linux Foundation
> Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
> mdolan@... <
mailto:mdolan@...>
> ---
>
>> On Mar 11, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Michael Dolan <mdolan@...
>> <
mailto:mdolan@...>> wrote:
>>
>> Just a quick update. We have 25 responses so far. If you’ve not
>> weighed in, please do so today. As mentioned yesterday on the call,
>> this is about which CoC to start from and there may be provisions to
>> add/remove before this goes for approval. Please look at the versions
>> Arnaud put on Google Docs (not the respective source’s website) as
>> there already have comments and suggestions for improvement embedded.
>>
>> I will send out a link to the current results at the end of today.
>>
>>> The survey is here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7FYFBGB
>>
>>>   * Cloud Foundry based: Option 1
>>>     <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZjSBGk8GAUVrupECzidQE9rhZwJLgaY0TRQLAAYcmzI/edit>
>>>   * W3C based: Option 2
>>>     <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uwT2x4yTmPn3xrRuqXZ4ZTcuIiZvF3N8VOnqFIO4Q-0/edit>
>>
>>  ---
>> Mike Dolan
>> VP of Strategic Programs
>> The Linux Foundation
>> Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
>> mdolan@... <
mailto:mdolan@...>
>> ---
>>
>>> On Mar 10, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Michael Dolan
>>> <mdolan@... <
mailto:mdolan@...>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Members of the Hyperledger technical community, on the TSC call
>>> today, there was a discussion on options for adopting a code of
>>> conduct for the community. There were various aspects of both the W3C
>>> and Cloud Foundry options that seemed appealing. In order for the TSC
>>> to make a more informed decision about the broader community’s
>>> preferences, we’ve put together a VERY simple survey to get your
>>> feedback. It should take you 1-3 minutes at most to weigh in on your
>>> preferences. Please help provide datapoint to help the TSC understand
>>> the preferences of the community.
>>>
>>> The survey is here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7FYFBGB
>>>
>>> If you missed the discussion on the TSC call today, the recording
>>> should be up shortly on the GitHub Wiki along with the minutes. If
>>> you have not looked at either, the respective code of conduct
>>> documents the team have been working on can be found at the URLs below.
>>>
>>>   * Cloud Foundry based: Option 1
>>>     <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZjSBGk8GAUVrupECzidQE9rhZwJLgaY0TRQLAAYcmzI/edit>
>>>   * W3C based: Option 2
>>>     <
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uwT2x4yTmPn3xrRuqXZ4ZTcuIiZvF3N8VOnqFIO4Q-0/edit>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Mike Dolan
>>> VP of Strategic Programs
>>> The Linux Foundation
>>> Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
>>> mdolan@... <
mailto:mdolan@...>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hyperledger-tsc mailing list
> hyperledger-tsc@...
>
https://lists.hyperledger.org/mailman/listinfo/hyperledger-tsc
>

--
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat -
http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338
_______________________________________________
hyperledger-tsc mailing list
hyperledger-tsc@...

https://lists.hyperledger.org/mailman/listinfo/hyperledger-tsc



_______________________________________________
hyperledger-tsc mailing list
hyperledger-tsc@...
https://lists.hyperledger.org/mailman/listinfo/hyperledger-tsc



Join toc@lists.hyperledger.org to automatically receive all group messages.