|
Ping on pull 152
Looks like its awaiting an ACK from Hart that he is a sponsor. On 1/18/21, 10:05 PM, "labs@... on behalf of Brian Behlendorf" <labs@... on behalf of bbehlendorf@li
Looks like its awaiting an ACK from Hart that he is a sponsor. On 1/18/21, 10:05 PM, "labs@... on behalf of Brian Behlendorf" <labs@... on behalf of bbehlendorf@li
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #107
·
|
|
[dancap] Attestation lab updates
Hi, Thanks to feedback from @pegartillo95 and others I’ve updated the lab to the latest SGX SDK, deps, and most recently Azure configuration. There was a version disparity in that environment complica
Hi, Thanks to feedback from @pegartillo95 and others I’ve updated the lab to the latest SGX SDK, deps, and most recently Azure configuration. There was a version disparity in that environment complica
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #90
·
|
|
A proposal to archive a number of labs
I’m ok archiving the poet 2 lab (and just noted so on the PR). I just sent a separate note to the SParts contributor in case they are not on this list. I got a note from an interested new contributor
I’m ok archiving the poet 2 lab (and just noted so on the PR). I just sent a separate note to the SParts contributor in case they are not on this list. I got a note from an interested new contributor
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #77
·
|
|
#umbra Introducing the Umbra Lab
#umbra
I declare Umbra winner of best lab name ever. :) --dan On 11/5/18, 12:51 PM, "labs@... on behalf of David Huseby" <labs@... on behalf of dhuseby@...
I declare Umbra winner of best lab name ever. :) --dan On 11/5/18, 12:51 PM, "labs@... on behalf of David Huseby" <labs@... on behalf of dhuseby@...
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #42
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto agenda ideas for Oct 31
#SharedCrypto
Tomorrow I’d like to use the blake PR to have some discussion about standards and tiers per https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/labs/topic/sharedcrypto_3rd_party/27631934?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fs
Tomorrow I’d like to use the blake PR to have some discussion about standards and tiers per https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/labs/topic/sharedcrypto_3rd_party/27631934?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fs
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #37
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto 3rd party library standards
#SharedCrypto
Yes, that criteria list was heavily biased towards standard implementations. To accommodate the other 2 tiers it should be expanded to quantify the level of review of the algorithm. When it comes to g
Yes, that criteria list was heavily biased towards standard implementations. To accommodate the other 2 tiers it should be expanded to quantify the level of review of the algorithm. When it comes to g
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #35
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto crypto-lib proposal update
#SharedCrypto
I’m fine with the updated maintainers concept. We can enforce n maintainer reviews with github. We already do that in sawtooth. I’m still planning to get the contributor rules writeup in as a PR befor
I’m fine with the updated maintainers concept. We can enforce n maintainer reviews with github. We already do that in sawtooth. I’m still planning to get the contributor rules writeup in as a PR befor
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #34
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto 3rd party library standards
#SharedCrypto
I propose we establish some standards for libraries we will incorporate in crypto-lib (or Ursa or whatever we will soon call it :) ) As a motivating example there’s a PR to add a blake2 library. I’ve
I propose we establish some standards for libraries we will incorporate in crypto-lib (or Ursa or whatever we will soon call it :) ) As a motivating example there’s a PR to add a blake2 library. I’ve
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #30
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto team-specific hack-a-thon?
#SharedCrypto
sounds good to me --Dan On 10/12/18, 2:45 PM, "labs@... on behalf of David Huseby" <labs@... on behalf of dhuseby@...> wrote: Hi Crypto-Lib Team, W
sounds good to me --Dan On 10/12/18, 2:45 PM, "labs@... on behalf of David Huseby" <labs@... on behalf of dhuseby@...> wrote: Hi Crypto-Lib Team, W
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #24
·
|
|
#SharedCrypto crypto-lib meeting tomorrow
#SharedCrypto
Thanks for wrangling this, Hart. Not sure if I can make it to today’s call. In case I can’t I’ve added a couple comments in the proposal. As further high-level thoughts, though, it might be helpful to
Thanks for wrangling this, Hart. Not sure if I can make it to today’s call. In case I can’t I’ve added a couple comments in the proposal. As further high-level thoughts, though, it might be helpful to
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #21
·
|
|
Crypto-lib Meeting May 30
Reminder we have a meeting Wed at 2-3pm GMT (8am PDT) ``` Agenda: 1. Common signing API (discuss proposed code from Indy perspective. Discuss differences between txn signing and block signing) 2. ZKLa
Reminder we have a meeting Wed at 2-3pm GMT (8am PDT) ``` Agenda: 1. Common signing API (discuss proposed code from Indy perspective. Discuss differences between txn signing and block signing) 2. ZKLa
|
By
Middleton, Dan
· #6
·
|