the difference of kafka and sbft


qs meng <qsmeng@...>
 

H,
    It is said that kafka can tolerate about one half nodes's failure with about 10000 tps and sbft can tolerate about one third nodes's failure with about 2000 tps. 
    From this comparison, kafka take an great advantage over sbft. why to use sbft? or they each have different appliation senarios
   Thank you.
   Regards,
qs Meng


 


Baohua Yang
 

qs

Here might give some explanation.


Besides, the maillist has removed all "hyperledger-" prefix, hence we can use fabric@....org directly.


On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:16 AM, qs meng <qsmeng@...> wrote:
H,
    It is said that kafka can tolerate about one half nodes's failure with about 10000 tps and sbft can tolerate about one third nodes's failure with about 2000 tps. 
    From this comparison, kafka take an great advantage over sbft. why to use sbft? or they each have different appliation senarios
   Thank you.
   Regards,
qs Meng


 




--
Best wishes!

Baohua Yang


qs meng <qsmeng@...>
 

Hi Baohua,
  thank you for the link.
  Maybe, kafka is good at detecting crash failure while bft is good at detecting malicous failure.
  best regards,
qs meng





在 2018-05-15 21:06:23,"Baohua Yang" <yangbaohua@...> 写道:

qs

Here might give some explanation.


Besides, the maillist has removed all "hyperledger-" prefix, hence we can use fabric@....org directly.


On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:16 AM, qs meng <qsmeng@...> wrote:
H,
    It is said that kafka can tolerate about one half nodes's failure with about 10000 tps and sbft can tolerate about one third nodes's failure with about 2000 tps. 
    From this comparison, kafka take an great advantage over sbft. why to use sbft? or they each have different appliation senarios
   Thank you.
   Regards,
qs Meng


 




--
Best wishes!

Baohua Yang