Hey Brett, This tutorial on channel policies may provide some helpful background: https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.2/create_channel/channel_policies.html I can only guess based o

Hello Famar, If you look at the sample configtx,yaml: https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/blob/main/sampleconfig/configtx.yaml, there is no intermediate CA section. Intermediate CA's are in the chan

Hello Avinash, Private data collections are only useful at the organization level, so you cannot create private collections for individuals. For individual level permissioning, you would be to use att

#fabric-private-data

Hi Nikos, There is no way to delete a channel. But as you spin up new peers and ordering nodes, you can select which channels they join. If you do not join them to channels that you do not want to pre

Which computer are you using? I remember getting something very similar when I tried to pull the latest images on an M1 mac. Nik

Hello BigBang, Others may have a different answer to this, but I would install the chaincode on all peers. That way you have redundancy in case of peer failure. If peer0Org1 goes down, then Peer1 can

#fabric-peer

Hi NIkos, Endorsement policies are based on organizations only, not the number of peers. Once an organization is added to the endorsement policy, they only need to deploy one peer to endorse a transac

You may need to use the MSP ID's of the organizations, rather than the informal names. Try this policy: "OR('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer')"

#policies #fabric-chaincode #fabric-questions #fabric-endorser

Hi, Can you confirm that the chaincode has been committed to the channel? Or can you do a docker ps to confirm that the chaincode containers have started. This error looks like the chaincode may not b

#policies #fabric-chaincode #fabric-questions #fabric-endorser

Hello, The signature policy approach would probably be the best one, though you can still try to use the implicit meta policies by either defining a new organization signature policy or removing the a

#fabric-questions #fabric

HI Carlos, You cannot query the definitions that have been approved by other organizations. However, you can use the checkcommitreadiness command peer lifecycle chaincode — hyperledger-fabricdocs mast

No. If you are referring to the members of the system channel as the "consortium", being removed from the system channel does not remove you from channels that a peer or ordering organization has join

#hyperledger-fabric #channel #consortium #administrator-organiization

This tutorial also discusses channel policies: Channel policies — hyperledger-fabricdocs master documentation (hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io)

Hello, The Fabric deployment guide would be the best place to start: https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.2/deployment_guide_overview.html Nik

#fabric

Ran the script today and see the command in my logs: + jq -s '.[0] * {"channel_group":{"groups":{"Application":{"groups": {"Org3MSP":.[1]}}}}}' config.json ./organizations/peerOrganizations/org3.examp

Looks good. Having all the SDK and smart contract language docs in one place is a great value add. Nik

Forward answer to the mailing list since so many hit these problems: ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Nikhil Gupta <nikhilg550@...> Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [H

Hello, I know that there were performance improvements between 1.x and 2.x and changes to the validation process that improved Fabric latency and throughput. However, going through Jira, many of the e

The deploy a chaincode to a channel tutorial also has a troubleshooting section that may be helpful: https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/deploy_chaincode.html#troubleshooting Nik -----

Hello Abhijeet, You can use this stack overflow thread to see a more detailed discussion of this error: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57662562/when-i-try-to-create-a-channel-using-hyperledger-fa