This sounds like a good idea! Hope to have a chance to try this out soon. Are you offering this a contribution to HL, for integration into the tree? Brian

I'm following this thread on the periphery, and wanted to highlight Imre's questions about the test environment and how it may compare to real-world deployments. I think it's crucial to start to artic

Here is the form for requesting access to the compute cluster. https://github.com/cncf/cluster Note that it says it's focused on CNCF (the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, also an LF project like us

On 06/21/2016 09:01 AM, Christopher B Ferris wrote: > FWIW, there has been continuing technical discussion in the context of each PR referenced below. That's a really good point, Chris - there has bee

The only question is one of our collective "radar" - how do we make sure new PRs get noticed by the community, active discussions on PRs get the appropriate attention, that sort of thing. "Watching" t

OK, that makes sense. Others on the Fabric list: do you "watch" the Github PR stream, and find it useful? Brian

So I've been following the firehose from watching the github issues (feeling foolish for not looking there before) and am loving all the activity. I am concerned, though, that sometimes important arch

Great, didn't see the "help wanted" tag before. Is it documented in the Wiki for first-time devs to see? I am not a huge fan of the bot idea, as I think it should be something the devs do in the momen

+1 to "spent elsewhere", is POR being tracked somewhere? Brian

This is another fascinating discussion I thought folks on the list may want to follow. Brian -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [hyperledger/fabric] Remove chaincode instance variables f

Hi Yi, You might find a better response to your question by posting it to the fabric discussion list - hyperledger-fabric@.... I've taken the liberty of cc'ing it there. Brian

Thanks for raising the pull request notice here - I'd encourage folks to comment on the PR itself, bringing it back here if there's anything controversial. I think that should also be done by develope

Great! Thanks for the attention. As far as "without a clear decision, voting will help" - I'd suggest that the community avoid too many technical architectural debates for which there isn't overwhelmi

I think this is a useful conversation to have, but this list is for discussing the technical implementation of the Hyperledger Fabric code, not really the right place for a broader conversation or deb

I'm cc'ing the TSC, as I think this is something that affects the technical efforts project-wide, and should be decided as an HL standard (or at least intend towards one). Follow-ups should probably b

Missing from the new home, but one can still find them on github. Ry, can we keep a copy of the commit log/transactions on the repo while it was live on github, just in case github ever disappears? Ma

Hi all; looks like Chris's reply in this thread never made it (at least not to the archives) so I'm passing it along again. Chris is on vacation this week, so we will circle back with this next, thoug

Binh, can you send that deck again, or better yet, commit it to the Wiki and send a link? It may have been lost; it looks like we were having mailing list issues last week that might have continued th

And for clarity, you can create that account at http://identity.linuxfoundation.org/ Sadly, browser auto-fill or password database tools won't pick up the name/password combo the first time you drop i

For the time being we can continue using the Github wiki, but to make the migration complete we should talk about setting up a separate wiki tool for the Hyperledger projects. Currently, the LF infras