peer chaincode invoke -o orderer0:7050 --tls --cafile=/etc/hyperledger/orderers/msp/tlscacerts/orderers-ca-7054.pem -C main -n fabcar -c '{"Args":["CreateCar", "CAR17", "Honda", "Accord", "black", "TEST1"]}'

peer chaincode invoke -o orderer0:7050 --tls --cafile=/etc/hyperledger/orderers/msp/tlscacerts/orderers-ca-7054.pem -C main -n fabcar -c '{"Args":["CreateCar", "CAR17", "Honda", "Accord", "black", "TEST1"]}'

2021-12-02 06:21:48.942 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 03c Subchannel picks a new address "orderer0:7050" to connect
2021-12-02 06:21:48.942 UTC [grpc] UpdateSubConnState -> DEBU 03d pickfirstBalancer: HandleSubConnStateChange: 0xc0003e8820, {CONNECTING <nil>}
2021-12-02 06:21:48.942 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 03e Channel Connectivity change to CONNECTING
2021-12-02 06:21:49.000 UTC [grpc] Warningf -> DEBU 03f grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {orderer0:7050  <nil> 0 <nil>}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for peer0-org1, not orderer0". Reconnecting...
2021-12-02 06:21:49.000 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 040 Subchannel Connectivity change to TRANSIENT_FAILURE
2021-12-02 06:21:49.000 UTC [grpc] UpdateSubConnState -> DEBU 041 pickfirstBalancer: HandleSubConnStateChange: 0xc0003e8820, {TRANSIENT_FAILURE connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for peer0-org1, not orderer0"}
2021-12-02 06:21:49.000 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 042 Channel Connectivity change to TRANSIENT_FAILURE
2021-12-02 06:21:50.000 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 043 Subchannel Connectivity change to CONNECTING
2021-12-02 06:21:50.001 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 044 Subchannel picks a new address "orderer0:7050" to connect
2021-12-02 06:21:50.001 UTC [grpc] UpdateSubConnState -> DEBU 045 pickfirstBalancer: HandleSubConnStateChange: 0xc0003e8820, {CONNECTING <nil>}
2021-12-02 06:21:50.001 UTC [grpc] Infof -> DEBU 046 Channel Connectivity change to CONNECTING
2021-12-02 06:21:50.057 UTC [grpc] Warningf -> DEBU 047 grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {orderer0:7050  <nil> 0 <nil>}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for peer0-org1, not orderer0". Reconnecting...

Disclaimer:

This e-mail and its attachments may contain official Indian Government information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized. The responsibility lies with the recipient to check this email and any attachment for the presence of viruses.   

Hi,

Could i get help how to backup full project and how to restore the complete project including peer, org, network data and container and container images.

Thanks in advance.

--

Best Regard:

Aoun Muhammad | SR.Manager - System | Digital Custodian Company Tel: +92 51 2726543-4 | Cell: +92 334 5005215 | aoun.muhammad@... | www.digitalcustodian.co Lower Ground | ISE Towers | Jinnah Avenue | Islamabad-44000 | Pakistan    Save Paper! Print Only If needed. Disclaimer: DCC assumes no responsibility of any private content sent in this email.

Hi,

I am looking for help in hyperledger fabric private network, In my requirements there are two computers on which I want to deploy hyperledger fabric network as redundant network if one computer goes down the service continue on the second computer without any interrupt(delay). How i design the network. Need your support. Thanks

--

Best Regard:

Aoun Muhammad | SR.Manager - System | Digital Custodian Company Tel: +92 51 2726543-4 | Cell: +92 334 5005215 | aoun.muhammad@... | www.digitalcustodian.co Lower Ground | ISE Towers | Jinnah Avenue | Islamabad-44000 | Pakistan    Save Paper! Print Only If needed. Disclaimer: DCC assumes no responsibility of any private content sent in this email.

Private Chaincode Lab

When:
11/30/2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(UTC-08:00) America/Los Angeles

Where:
https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community.3?pwd=UE90WHhEaHRqOGEyMkV3cldKa2d2dz09

Organizer: Marcus Brandenburger bur@...

View Event

Description:
Two of the Hyperleger Labs projects (private data objects and private chain code) are collaborating to develop a "private smart contracts" capability.

Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/5184947650?pwd=UE90WHhEaHRqOGEyMkV3cldKa2d2dz09 Meeting ID: 518 494 7650 Passcode: 475869

HyperFredger and Conacoc,

Is there a way to make homomorphic encryption be assymetric? If not, the secret key would be the same to encrypt and decrypt any bid, which unfortunately may defeat the purpose of using this kind of cryptography for this auction application.

Regards,

Bruno Andreghetti @ GoLedger

The Hyperledger Fabric maintainers are pleased to announce the availability of Fabric v2.4.0!

Hyperledger Fabric v2.4 introduces the Fabric Gateway into peer nodes as well as new lightweight Gateway SDKs to simplify client applications and transaction submission.

Read all about the Fabric Gateway and other improvements in the What's New documentation:
https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.4/whatsnew.html#what-s-new-in-hyperledger-fabric-v2-4

See the release notes for additional details:
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/releases/tag/v2.4.0

Note - While Fabric v2.4 introduces new features and improvements, Fabric v2.2.x remains the current long-term support release until the next LTS release is announced.


Thanks,

The Hyperledger Fabric maintainers

Hello!

I've been trying to get the first user ever registered to my hyperledger-fabric network, using the function from ca.utils.ts: registerUserWallet, and since it's the very first user, it attempts to enroll the user as an admin user but for some reason fails to do so.

The error I'm getting is: Failed to register user : Error: fabric-ca request register failed with errors [[ { code: 71, message: 'Authorization failure' } ]].

Does anyone know how to fix this?

I checked online and it seems like it could be related to affiliations or user roles, but I'm not quite sure. 

Hello everyone,

Thank you all for your responses.  A lot of stuff was clarified that was confusing at first, so I appreciate it.

@Bharg thanks again as always for chiming into all my posts and providing the reference.  Parts of it was cut off.  I don't know if that is intentional or not, but nonetheless I appreciate it.

I'm still a little confused about it but I'm sure I will understand it completely.  Have a great day everyone.