Yes, an aggregator running the client SDK would be needed. In Oracle Blockchain Platform we provide a built in aggregator with REST APIs. If the IOT devices can make REST calls, that’s all

If you are using client SDK for Fabric, use register() and enroll() APIs to register client orgs and issue their enrollment cert. Mark

As Yacov said, it is not recommended although it is possible. There are details that explain the deployment steps in this

You can, but it's not recommended From: "Pechimuthu T"<tpmuthu@...> To: alaskadd@...,fabric@... Date: 04/29/2021 02:40 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:[Hyperledger Fabric] Fabric CA

Hi, For an Organization let say Org1, if we setup a CA server, do We have to setup of TLSCA separately ? Can't we use the same CA which can function as CA and TLSCA as well ? Thanks and

So you propose each IoT end device (ED) to be an organization? The EDs can not support fabric to run the a fabric client application and start a transaction, somehow a proxy (or a IoT) should

Thanks for your reply. You mean, like we register users in an org? These users are defined in crypto-config.yaml and cryptogen assigns IDs to all. New users are added via the client API. When devices

You can register the IoT devices as client orgs of the trusted node with their own signing certs. Instead of sending an avg, send the actual data and let the chaincode maintain a running average and

It seems it should work, but it is possibly using the generic orderer.yaml file and not your env variables. So, you may want to double-check that you are working from the correct directory and you

From what I have found so far in a limited bit of looking into the effects of the deprecation when it actually happens is that it will cause a breaking change to the Dind container. Although there is

I am wondering if in a private Hyperledger Fabric 2.2 network with N organizations in one channel can have different private smart contracts? Specifically, I would like to build a network with N orgs

Fabric Contributor Meeting When: Wednesday, 28 April 2021 9:00am to 10:00am (GMT-04:00) America/New

The fundamental assumption of a blockchain is that with enough peers it is extremely unlikely for the majority of them to get hacked. Translated to Fabric - you need multiple organizations, each with

Hello, I have a question in the following scenario. We have 2 organizations with 5 endorsing (&commiting) peers each one and X orderers. If all the peers of the network are hacked and always approve

In an IoT scenario, multiple nodes are sending frequent data. It is not feasible to create a fabric network with all devices. Instead, a fabric node acts as an aggregator, that takes all values from

If a Fabric peer node is hacked, is there a way to figure it out? For example, N1 (org1), N2 (org2), N3 (org3) and N4(org4) are in network. Each N is a peer. Breaking down the fabric flow: 1)The

Using DinD in the short term should work ok, but be aware that you will need to run the Dind container with elevated privileges which can be problematic in many environments. The best course of

Sure, here it is, ############## image: hyperledger/fabric-orderer:2.3 environment: - FABRIC_LOGGING_SPEC=INFO - ORDERER_GENERAL_LISTENADDRESS=0.0.0.0 -

Hyperledger Fabric Contributor Meeting When: Every other Wednesday 9am US Eastern, 13:00 UTC Where: https
://zoom.us/j/51849
47650?pwd=UE90WHhEaHRqOGEyMkV3cldKa2d2dz09 Agendas and Recordings:

Hi Shantanu, Can you please share all of your orderer env variables? That may assist in helping. Thanks