|
anyone able to iterate over records using getStateByRange?
this method:
https://fabric-shim.github.io/master/fabric-shim.ChaincodeStub.html#getStateByRange
Note that startKey and endKey can be empty string, which implies unbounded range query on start or
this method:
https://fabric-shim.github.io/master/fabric-shim.ChaincodeStub.html#getStateByRange
Note that startKey and endKey can be empty string, which implies unbounded range query on start or
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7646
·
|
|
Peer crash due to error during block commit
#fabric
#couchdb
Error:
Got error while committing(read tcp 10.0.9.49:37944->10.0.9.15:5984: read: connection reset by peer
error reading response body
We have the following environment setup and
Error:
Got error while committing(read tcp 10.0.9.49:37944->10.0.9.15:5984: read: connection reset by peer
error reading response body
We have the following environment setup and
|
By
Faisal
·
#7645
·
|
|
Re: Error: could not assemble transaction: ProposalResponsePayloads do not match
I got this error often, the reason is all the peer node execute their own chaincode individually and even if the result is successful, it doesn't means that all the payload are the same. By looking at
I got this error often, the reason is all the peer node execute their own chaincode individually and even if the result is successful, it doesn't means that all the payload are the same. By looking at
|
By
Kimheng SOK
·
#7644
·
|
|
Re: CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS when peer is not running in a docker container
Whatever public IP other peers would use to connect to it. Docker and NAT (in docker's case double or triple NAT) complicate matters, you will have to pay attention to how you will have peers
Whatever public IP other peers would use to connect to it. Docker and NAT (in docker's case double or triple NAT) complicate matters, you will have to pay attention to how you will have peers
|
By
Nye Liu <nye@...>
·
#7643
·
|
|
CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS when peer is not running in a docker container
What should be the CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS when the peer is not running in a docker container? E.g., peer is running on the host and listening for chaincode at 0.0.0.0:7052. If we set
What should be the CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS when the peer is not running in a docker container? E.g., peer is running on the host and listening for chaincode at 0.0.0.0:7052. If we set
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7642
·
|
|
Re: Error: could not assemble transaction: ProposalResponsePayloads do not match
could anyone point us to the code where the response payload is generated? is there any doc explaining what the response payload is? its a byte array but what does it contain?
From: Siddharth Jain
could anyone point us to the code where the response payload is generated? is there any doc explaining what the response payload is? its a byte array but what does it contain?
From: Siddharth Jain
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7641
·
|
|
Re: Storing/Retrieving key values in a collaborative way - endorsement policy
Your question gets to the heart of many use cases. And with v2.0 release coming, this is a great time to have the discussion. You have two options to choose from depending on your specific
Your question gets to the heart of many use cases. And with v2.0 release coming, this is a great time to have the discussion. You have two options to choose from depending on your specific
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#7640
·
|
|
Storing/Retrieving key values in a collaborative way - endorsement policy
Hello Fabric guys,
I have a scenario where there are X orgs in a Hyperledger Fabric network.
I would like to have each org can create/set/reset their respective values for key(s).
However, other orgs
Hello Fabric guys,
I have a scenario where there are X orgs in a Hyperledger Fabric network.
I would like to have each org can create/set/reset their respective values for key(s).
However, other orgs
|
By
Anoop Vijayan <anoop@...>
·
#7639
·
|
|
Error: could not assemble transaction: ProposalResponsePayloads do not match
we get this error when trying to invoke the chaincode on a network of 3 peers. However, we have verified if we invoke the chaincode individually on the peer nodes, all of them respond with Chaincode
we get this error when trying to invoke the chaincode on a network of 3 peers. However, we have verified if we invoke the chaincode individually on the peer nodes, all of them respond with Chaincode
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7638
·
|
|
signature set did not satisfy policy
#fabric
#fabric-questions
I've created a network configuration with 2 orgs, each one with 1 peer and CA.
I've successfully installed and instantiated my chaincode on both peers
But after invoking a transaction this error
I've created a network configuration with 2 orgs, each one with 1 peer and CA.
I've successfully installed and instantiated my chaincode on both peers
But after invoking a transaction this error
|
By
George
·
#7637
·
|
|
revive^CC: static analysis of Go smart contracts
Has anyone taken a look at revive^CC? it is:
Static analysis tool for Hyperledger Fabric smart contracts written in Go.
Ry--
Ry Jones
Community Architect, Hyperledger
Chat: @rjones
Has anyone taken a look at revive^CC? it is:
Static analysis tool for Hyperledger Fabric smart contracts written in Go.
Ry--
Ry Jones
Community Architect, Hyperledger
Chat: @rjones
|
By
Ry Jones
·
#7636
·
|
|
Re: CORE_PEER_ADDRESS vs CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS
Listen is for the bind() call. Peer address is the externally visible address published during discovery. Please research bind() if that is unclear.
Listen is for the bind() call. Peer address is the externally visible address published during discovery. Please research bind() if that is unclear.
|
By
Nye Liu <nye@...>
·
#7635
·
|
|
Re: CORE_PEER_ADDRESS vs CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS
One more question.
I am assuming the CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS and CORE_PEER_CHAINCODELISTENADDRESS are analogous to CORE_PEER_ADDRESS and CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS respectively i.e.,
whereas the
One more question.
I am assuming the CORE_PEER_CHAINCODEADDRESS and CORE_PEER_CHAINCODELISTENADDRESS are analogous to CORE_PEER_ADDRESS and CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS respectively i.e.,
whereas the
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7634
·
|
|
Re: CORE_PEER_ADDRESS vs CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS
What if your friend is abroad and you'recalling his office phone, and he configured his office phone to redirectthe call to his cellphone?
The listen address is the address thepeerbinds its socket. It
What if your friend is abroad and you'recalling his office phone, and he configured his office phone to redirectthe call to his cellphone?
The listen address is the address thepeerbinds its socket. It
|
By
Yacov
·
#7633
·
|
|
CORE_PEER_ADDRESS vs CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS
from the docs w.r.t. CORE_PEER_ADDRESS it is said that this represents the endpoint to other peers in the same organization.
and CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS is The Address at local network interface this
from the docs w.r.t. CORE_PEER_ADDRESS it is said that this represents the endpoint to other peers in the same organization.
and CORE_PEER_LISTENADDRESS is The Address at local network interface this
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#7632
·
|
|
Re: #fabric #fabric-kubernetes #hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
#fabric-kubernetes
#hyperledger-fabric
You can start by having a look at this generic network.
https://github.com/lepar/hyperledger-fabric-generic-network
Other resources can include the fabric documentation network
You can start by having a look at this generic network.
https://github.com/lepar/hyperledger-fabric-generic-network
Other resources can include the fabric documentation network
|
By
Nicholas Leonardi
·
#7631
·
|
|
#fabric #fabric-kubernetes #hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
#fabric-kubernetes
#hyperledger-fabric
Hi, can someone point me to more information on the resources we could need for a Hyperledger Fabric production deployment? The idea is to start with 3 organizations using on premise hardware. We are
Hi, can someone point me to more information on the resources we could need for a Hyperledger Fabric production deployment? The idea is to start with 3 organizations using on premise hardware. We are
|
By
jquesada@...
·
#7630
·
|
|
Re: Is HLF a DLT or a blockchain?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
|
By
Nye Liu <nye@...>
·
#7629
·
|
|
Re: Is HLF a DLT or a blockchain?
‘Altar of Proof of Work’ seems to be the biggest sticking point for all the definitions and it echoes “bitcoin maximalism”. In my mind, Linux Foundation, have made so much investment into the
‘Altar of Proof of Work’ seems to be the biggest sticking point for all the definitions and it echoes “bitcoin maximalism”. In my mind, Linux Foundation, have made so much investment into the
|
By
greg m
·
#7628
·
|
|
Re: Is HLF a DLT or a blockchain?
Let's not get too hung up on terminology in such a charged environment. Don't take this as an "official statement".
Yes, Fabric's underlying data structure involves a string of
Let's not get too hung up on terminology in such a charged environment. Don't take this as an "official statement".
Yes, Fabric's underlying data structure involves a string of
|
By
Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...>
·
#7627
·
|