|
Fabric Private Chaincode -- New Release
#fabric
#fabric-rfcs
#fpc
Hi Fabric Community,
the FPC Team is happy to announce a new release of Fabric Private Chaincode -- a framework built on (unmodified) Hyperledger Fabric to enhance data confidentiality for
Hi Fabric Community,
the FPC Team is happy to announce a new release of Fabric Private Chaincode -- a framework built on (unmodified) Hyperledger Fabric to enhance data confidentiality for
|
By
Vavala, Bruno
·
#9608
·
|
|
Re: ValidateLSCCInvocation failed error
It looks like you are using legacy chaincode. 'Upgrade' is a transaction on the channel, therefore you only need to do it once for the whole channel, not per peer or per organization.
Dave
It looks like you are using legacy chaincode. 'Upgrade' is a transaction on the channel, therefore you only need to do it once for the whole channel, not per peer or per organization.
Dave
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9607
·
|
|
Private Chaincode Lab - Tue, 02/09/2021
#cal-notice
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 9 February 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-08:00) America/Los
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 9 February 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-08:00) America/Los
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#9606
·
|
|
ValidateLSCCInvocation failed error
Hi Team,
I have two organizations and two peers each. For some reason, we just upgraded only one peer in each organization (but installed chaincode all peers).
Now I need to run all 4 peers but I have
Hi Team,
I have two organizations and two peers each. For some reason, we just upgraded only one peer in each organization (but installed chaincode all peers).
Now I need to run all 4 peers but I have
|
By
jay park
·
#9605
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
If you update the corresponding 'parent' prefix for every transaction, you could just write it every time instead of read/write. You only receive conflicts when you read/write. e.g. write four records
If you update the corresponding 'parent' prefix for every transaction, you could just write it every time instead of read/write. You only receive conflicts when you read/write. e.g. write four records
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9604
·
|
|
Re: ENC: [Hyperledger Fabric] Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
Yes, that's right. Note that you can update N key/values in the 2nd transaction, if you have such a need. You don't have to update them one at a time.
Dave Enyeart
"Tomás Peixinho" ---02/08/2021
Yes, that's right. Note that you can update N key/values in the 2nd transaction, if you have such a need. You don't have to update them one at a time.
Dave Enyeart
"Tomás Peixinho" ---02/08/2021
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9603
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
This could be solved by the following approach:
https://www.github.com/hyperledger/fabric-samples/tree/master/high-throughput
Basically, you could store all the request as it is, in its own key. Then
This could be solved by the following approach:
https://www.github.com/hyperledger/fabric-samples/tree/master/high-throughput
Basically, you could store all the request as it is, in its own key. Then
|
By
Prasanth Sundaravelu
·
#9602
·
|
|
ENC: [Hyperledger Fabric] Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
Thank you for your feedback, Dave!
I see the value of the ranged queries now, that actually makes sense, I hadn't thought about it. It just doesn't serve me very well.
However, your idea to separate
Thank you for your feedback, Dave!
I see the value of the ranged queries now, that actually makes sense, I hadn't thought about it. It just doesn't serve me very well.
However, your idea to separate
|
By
Tomás Peixinho
·
#9601
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
Dear Tomás,
Have you seen this?
Please review the following - perhaps you need to craft the solution to the problem slightly differently and side step the implementation
Dear Tomás,
Have you seen this?
Please review the following - perhaps you need to craft the solution to the problem slightly differently and side step the implementation
|
By
Bharg Pvr <pvrbharg@...>
·
#9600
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
I don't think it's possible in my project (this is my master's thesis, the idea was defined like this by my thesis advisors, who don't know much about blockchain technology).
But I can be more
I don't think it's possible in my project (this is my master's thesis, the idea was defined like this by my thesis advisors, who don't know much about blockchain technology).
But I can be more
|
By
Tomás Peixinho
·
#9599
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
There is no ability to turn off the phantom validation. The idea behind range queries in update transactions is that you would scope them to a set of keys that you expect won't be updated
There is no ability to turn off the phantom validation. The idea behind range queries in update transactions is that you would scope them to a set of keys that you expect won't be updated
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9598
·
|
|
Re: Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
Is it possible for you to diversify the range query you would be using?
For example: Let's say there are 3 clients, each client can have a namespace in ledger and are only able to update keys in
Is it possible for you to diversify the range query you would be using?
For example: Let's say there are 3 clients, each client can have a namespace in ledger and are only able to update keys in
|
By
Prasanth Sundaravelu
·
#9597
·
|
|
Commit Phase Re-Validation - Phantom Reads
Good afternoon,
I'm developing an application using Hyperledger Fabric that requires me to, in order to do an insertion on the blockchain, check a lot of the stored keys, so that it can know which one
Good afternoon,
I'm developing an application using Hyperledger Fabric that requires me to, in order to do an insertion on the blockchain, check a lot of the stored keys, so that it can know which one
|
By
Tomás Peixinho
·
#9596
·
|
|
Re: Fabric chaincode error when trying to query the database through a partial Composite Key
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
Thanks - Andy Hurt has replied to the comment on stack overflow.
Matthew White
Thanks - Andy Hurt has replied to the comment on stack overflow.
Matthew White
|
By
Matthew White
·
#9595
·
|
|
Re: Peer & Orderer Domain Names Visibility
#hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
Hi Tsvetan,
Thanks for that clarification. In fact, that is our ideology also where we're saying participating organisations joining the network can decide whether or not they want to run their own
Hi Tsvetan,
Thanks for that clarification. In fact, that is our ideology also where we're saying participating organisations joining the network can decide whether or not they want to run their own
|
By
Samyak Jain | TraceX
·
#9594
·
|
|
Re: Peer & Orderer Domain Names Visibility
#hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
Hi Samyak Jain,
My last point is regarding the technical network layer (not the fabric network). Let's assume there are multiple organizations that each has fabric nodes. From technical networking
Hi Samyak Jain,
My last point is regarding the technical network layer (not the fabric network). Let's assume there are multiple organizations that each has fabric nodes. From technical networking
|
By
Tsvetan Georgiev
·
#9593
·
|
|
Re: Peer & Orderer Domain Names Visibility
#hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 06:06 AM, Tsvetan Georgiev wrote:
honestly
Hi Tsvetan,Thanks for such a detailed explanation, however, I don't fully comprehend your last point. Can you elaborate further on
On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 06:06 AM, Tsvetan Georgiev wrote:
honestly
Hi Tsvetan,Thanks for such a detailed explanation, however, I don't fully comprehend your last point. Can you elaborate further on
|
By
Samyak Jain | TraceX
·
#9592
·
|
|
Re: Peer & Orderer Domain Names Visibility
#hyperledger-fabric
#fabric
Hi Samyak Jain,
I expect many of the networks to be hybrid deployments running on very heterogeneous infrastructure and communication over internet is essential (just make sure TLS is always
Hi Samyak Jain,
I expect many of the networks to be hybrid deployments running on very heterogeneous infrastructure and communication over internet is essential (just make sure TLS is always
|
By
Tsvetan Georgiev
·
#9591
·
|
|
Fabric chaincode error when trying to query the database through a partial Composite Key
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
Hi Community,
this is my first time deploying chaincode to a fabric network and I'm fairely new to golang.
Right now I'm trying to create a system where a patient can create a permission for a doctor
Hi Community,
this is my first time deploying chaincode to a fabric network and I'm fairely new to golang.
Right now I'm trying to create a system where a patient can create a permission for a doctor
|
By
jonashiltl2003@...
·
#9590
·
|
|
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere - Fri, 02/05/2021
#cal-notice
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When:
Friday, 5 February 2021
11:00am to 12:00pm
(GMT-05:00) America/New
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When:
Friday, 5 February 2021
11:00am to 12:00pm
(GMT-05:00) America/New
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#9589
·
|