|
How to perform a "JOIN" using couchdb
#couchdb
#database
Hi. My name is Rodrigo and I am starting with HF (v2.2). Can someone point me a link about how to perform a JOIN (the equivalent map-reduce) using couchdb? I need a doc, an example, something (I
Hi. My name is Rodrigo and I am starting with HF (v2.2). Can someone point me a link about how to perform a JOIN (the equivalent map-reduce) using couchdb? I need a doc, an example, something (I
|
By
rodrigomelo9@...
·
#9801
·
|
|
Re: Security Analysis of Private Data Collection of Hyperledger Fabric
As far as opening up the original HackerOne reports, I'd be fine with that if the process allows since the reports were resolved with documentation clarifications. The same documentation references
As far as opening up the original HackerOne reports, I'd be fine with that if the process allows since the reports were resolved with documentation clarifications. The same documentation references
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9800
·
|
|
Re: Security Analysis of Private Data Collection of Hyperledger Fabric
These are neither design flaws nor vulnerabilities. We have various configuration parameters for private data collection. For example, the following is a configuration of a private data collection.
{
These are neither design flaws nor vulnerabilities. We have various configuration parameters for private data collection. For example, the following is a configuration of a private data collection.
{
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#9799
·
|
|
Re: Security Analysis of Private Data Collection of Hyperledger Fabric
As it appears the "issues" described in this paper are not really security issues, can the paper be made available to a wider audience? Hackerone has all the reports related to this marked as
As it appears the "issues" described in this paper are not really security issues, can the paper be made available to a wider audience? Hackerone has all the reports related to this marked as
|
By
Todd Little
·
#9798
·
|
|
Private Chaincode Lab - Tue, 03/30/2021
#cal-notice
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 30 March 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 30 March 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#9797
·
|
|
Re: calling a methods chaincode from a different method in the same chaincode
#fabric-chaincode
Hi Malik,
The contract API is used to invoke a chaincode usually deployed as separate instance (could be on the same or different channel).
When you need to call a method inside your chaincode you
Hi Malik,
The contract API is used to invoke a chaincode usually deployed as separate instance (could be on the same or different channel).
When you need to call a method inside your chaincode you
|
By
Tsvetan Georgiev
·
#9796
·
|
|
calling a methods chaincode from a different method in the same chaincode
#fabric-chaincode
Hello Guys,
Just a quick question.
I have this scenario where I'm calling one method inside a chaincode A (let's say to update some properties based on external factors). Now, these external
Hello Guys,
Just a quick question.
I have this scenario where I'm calling one method inside a chaincode A (let's say to update some properties based on external factors). Now, these external
|
By
Marek Malik <info@...>
·
#9795
·
|
|
Re: #fabric-chaincode
#fabric-chaincode
Hi,
No, you don't have to start each contract individually in the main() function.
In the Contract.NewChaincode() pass the multiple Contracts.
Thanks,
Nidhi Singh
Hi,
No, you don't have to start each contract individually in the main() function.
In the Contract.NewChaincode() pass the multiple Contracts.
Thanks,
Nidhi Singh
|
By
Nidhi Singh
·
#9794
·
|
|
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-chaincode
How to deploy multi contracts in one chaincode package?
In single contract examples, there is a main() function starts the defined contracts by shim.Start().
In multi contracts scenario, do I need to
How to deploy multi contracts in one chaincode package?
In single contract examples, there is a main() function starts the defined contracts by shim.Start().
In multi contracts scenario, do I need to
|
By
nothingshy001@...
·
#9793
·
|
|
Re: Editing default signature policy for chaincode triggers error while running transactions: received discovery error:failed constructing descriptor for chaincodes. Commercial paper on Test-network
#policies
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
#fabric-endorser
Hi Nik,
You are right!
Defining the policy using the MSP ID's of the organizations, everything works as expected.
Thank You.
Stefano
Hi Nik,
You are right!
Defining the policy using the MSP ID's of the organizations, everything works as expected.
Thank You.
Stefano
|
By
sangieri@...
·
#9792
·
|
|
Re: Security Analysis of Private Data Collection of Hyperledger Fabric
I still think it is in your best interest to make some minor updates to the paper content to avoid using sensational language such as "design flaws" and "vulnerabilities". Researchers tend to get
I still think it is in your best interest to make some minor updates to the paper content to avoid using sensational language such as "design flaws" and "vulnerabilities". Researchers tend to get
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9791
·
|
|
Re: Editing default signature policy for chaincode triggers error while running transactions: received discovery error:failed constructing descriptor for chaincodes. Commercial paper on Test-network
#policies
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
#fabric-endorser
You may need to use the MSP ID's of the organizations, rather than the informal names.
Try this policy: "OR('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer')"
You may need to use the MSP ID's of the organizations, rather than the informal names.
Try this policy: "OR('Org1MSP.peer','Org2MSP.peer')"
|
By
Nikhil Gupta
·
#9790
·
|
|
Re: Editing default signature policy for chaincode triggers error while running transactions: received discovery error:failed constructing descriptor for chaincodes. Commercial paper on Test-network
#policies
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
#fabric-endorser
Hi Community,
Still facing the same issue.
Additional log from monitordocker.sh net_test:
"peer0.org2.example.com|2021-03-29 12:22:25.948 UTC [discovery] chaincodeQuery -> ERRO 066 Failed
Hi Community,
Still facing the same issue.
Additional log from monitordocker.sh net_test:
"peer0.org2.example.com|2021-03-29 12:22:25.948 UTC [discovery] chaincodeQuery -> ERRO 066 Failed
|
By
sangieri@...
·
#9789
·
|
|
Re: Proper way of handling singcerts after expiration
#openssl
#signcerts
#x509
Hi Alejo,
There are multiple aspects to consider when rotating or updating the expired certs (TLS or identity)
"1. What is the recommended procedure to replace expired signcerts with new ones on a
Hi Alejo,
There are multiple aspects to consider when rotating or updating the expired certs (TLS or identity)
"1. What is the recommended procedure to replace expired signcerts with new ones on a
|
By
Tsvetan Georgiev
·
#9788
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
Works like a charm. Thank you.
Works like a charm. Thank you.
|
By
Nikos Karamolegkos
·
#9787
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
You'll need to build with "GO_TAGS=noplugin" to disable the plugins when building the docker images.
Should be as simple as 'make clean-all docker native GO_TAGS=noplugin'.
You can verify the peer
You'll need to build with "GO_TAGS=noplugin" to disable the plugins when building the docker images.
Should be as simple as 'make clean-all docker native GO_TAGS=noplugin'.
You can verify the peer
|
By
Matthew Sykes
·
#9786
·
|
|
Proper way of handling singcerts after expiration
#openssl
#signcerts
#x509
Hi guys
We have a HLF running on a production environment, and the signcerts certificates are about to expire (both MSP and TLS).
The certificate are issued by our own organizations CA.
I have 2
Hi guys
We have a HLF running on a production environment, and the signcerts certificates are about to expire (both MSP and TLS).
The certificate are issued by our own organizations CA.
I have 2
|
By
Alejo Acosta
·
#9785
·
|
|
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere - Fri, 03/26/2021
#cal-notice
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When:
Friday, 26 March 2021
11:00am to 12:00pm
(GMT-04:00) America/New
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When:
Friday, 26 March 2021
11:00am to 12:00pm
(GMT-04:00) America/New
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#9784
·
|
|
Re: Fabric Contributor Meeting - March 17, 2021 - any agenda topics?
Thank you Vitalii, sounds good. Based on our side conversation, I've scheduled you for April 14th on the contributor meeting page -
Thank you Vitalii, sounds good. Based on our side conversation, I've scheduled you for April 14th on the contributor meeting page -
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9783
·
|
|
Re: peer discovery/collection errors when calling chaincode from nodejs client
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your response and for your helpful direction! The explicit designation of endorsing peer at transaction submit was exactly what I was looking for. After
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your response and for your helpful direction! The explicit designation of endorsing peer at transaction submit was exactly what I was looking for. After
|
By
Simeon MacMillen
·
#9782
·
|