|
Editing default signature policy for chaincode triggers error while running transactions: received discovery error:failed constructing descriptor for chaincodes. Commercial paper on Test-network
#policies
#fabric-chaincode
#fabric-questions
#fabric-endorser
Using the default configuration I can run all the functions inside the application folder of commercial paper on test-network without any problem
If I edit the default signature policy in the
Using the default configuration I can run all the functions inside the application folder of commercial paper on test-network without any problem
If I edit the default signature policy in the
|
By
sangieri@...
·
#9779
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
Thank you for your time. I just ran the test-network (after your contribution) but the error remains. My steps were: make docker clean, make docker, make native, copy the bin into fabric samples.
Thank you for your time. I just ran the test-network (after your contribution) but the error remains. My steps were: make docker clean, make docker, make native, copy the bin into fabric samples.
|
By
Nikos Karamolegkos
·
#9778
·
|
|
Re: Fabric Contributor Meeting - March 17, 2021 - any agenda topics?
Hi David and all!
I would like to propose one more item for March 31st agenda. We would like to open a discussion on our RFC:
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-rfcs/pull/44
I am planning to attend
Hi David and all!
I would like to propose one more item for March 31st agenda. We would like to open a discussion on our RFC:
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-rfcs/pull/44
I am planning to attend
|
By
Vitalii Demianets
·
#9777
·
|
|
Re: peer discovery/collection errors when calling chaincode from nodejs client
You might need to set some discovery interests for the private data collections you are using. See the "using chaincode to chaincode calls and collections" section on this page for
You might need to set some discovery interests for the private data collections you are using. See the "using chaincode to chaincode calls and collections" section on this page for
|
By
Mark Lewis
·
#9776
·
|
|
Re: Fabric network org structure reg.
Hi Indirajith,
Yes it is better to use dedicated MSP for the ordering orgs. This means a business organization may use multiple MSPs to run peers or orderers.
You can find details on the MSP concept
Hi Indirajith,
Yes it is better to use dedicated MSP for the ordering orgs. This means a business organization may use multiple MSPs to run peers or orderers.
You can find details on the MSP concept
|
By
Tsvetan Georgiev
·
#9775
·
|
|
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere - Fri, 03/26/2021 11:00am-12:00pm
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When: Friday, 26 March 2021, 11:00am to 12:00pm, (GMT-04:00) America/New
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When: Friday, 26 March 2021, 11:00am to 12:00pm, (GMT-04:00) America/New
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <fabric@...>
·
#9773
·
|
|
peer discovery/collection errors when calling chaincode from nodejs client
Hello Fabric community,
I am encountering a couple issues when accessing/writing data to a Fabric (2.3) network from a Node.js client. I have a 4-org network running on 4
Hello Fabric community,
I am encountering a couple issues when accessing/writing data to a Fabric (2.3) network from a Node.js client. I have a 4-org network running on 4
|
By
Simeon MacMillen
·
#9772
·
|
|
Re: HyperLedger Fabric v2.3 Endorsement Policy did not come into action
This is working as expected. You updated the size field but not the version field. The read set check only checks the version field. It is up to the chaincode to check other fields such as asset
This is working as expected. You updated the size field but not the version field. The read set check only checks the version field. It is up to the chaincode to check other fields such as asset
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#9771
·
|
|
HyperLedger Fabric v2.3 Endorsement Policy did not come into action
Hi,
I was trying to test out the endorsement policy feature of Fabric with the Running a Fabric Application tutorial and I have encountered a few questions/issues.
Instead of using LevelDB, I up the
Hi,
I was trying to test out the endorsement policy feature of Fabric with the Running a Fabric Application tutorial and I have encountered a few questions/issues.
Instead of using LevelDB, I up the
|
By
Ming Xian Ng
·
#9770
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
I had some time this morning so I played around with the peer image created on linux/aarch64 (linux/arm64). To get to the bottom of why the program was dying during initialization, I commented out all
I had some time this morning so I played around with the peer image created on linux/aarch64 (linux/arm64). To get to the bottom of why the program was dying during initialization, I commented out all
|
By
Matthew Sykes
·
#9769
·
|
|
Fabric network org structure reg.
Dear Fabric Community,
I would like to know what is the best practice or prefered method to design a fabric network in 2.x versions? Shall we have orderers in the same organization as peers or should
Dear Fabric Community,
I would like to know what is the best practice or prefered method to design a fabric network in 2.x versions? Shall we have orderers in the same organization as peers or should
|
By
indirajith
·
#9768
·
|
|
Re: Smart BFT
Hi guys
I looked at several git branch prefix release-1.4-BFT, what is the difference between them? What is the correct version for docker https://hub.docker.com/r/smartbft/fabric-peer?
Hi guys
I looked at several git branch prefix release-1.4-BFT, what is the difference between them? What is the correct version for docker https://hub.docker.com/r/smartbft/fabric-peer?
|
By
grapebaba
·
#9767
·
|
|
Re: Orderer ledger pruning
The RFC draft has been submitted, here:
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-rfcs/pull/44
Please review!
--
// Vitalii Demianets @ norbloc AB
The RFC draft has been submitted, here:
https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-rfcs/pull/44
Please review!
--
// Vitalii Demianets @ norbloc AB
|
By
Vitalii Demianets
·
#9766
·
|
|
Private Chaincode Lab - Tue, 03/23/2021
#cal-notice
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 23 March 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los
Private Chaincode Lab
When:
Tuesday, 23 March 2021
8:00am to 9:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#9765
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
Yeah, they’re all my commits so I’m very familiar with them. The change you’re referencing this time was required to get through the link phase in the alpine containers but the binaries in the
Yeah, they’re all my commits so I’m very familiar with them. The change you’re referencing this time was required to get through the link phase in the alpine containers but the binaries in the
|
By
Matthew Sykes
·
#9764
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
While I hold that those changes do in fact make building Fabric for ARM64 possible, as Matt mentioned it's not officially supported. I can say that I've tested that change on PI4 and when done right
While I hold that those changes do in fact make building Fabric for ARM64 possible, as Matt mentioned it's not officially supported. I can say that I've tested that change on PI4 and when done right
|
By
Brett T Logan <development.brett@...>
·
#9763
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
Sorry I misclick the commit link. The correct one is this. Also, this answer made me believe that raspberry pi4 is supported (even at an early stage). I can take a look on
Sorry I misclick the commit link. The correct one is this. Also, this answer made me believe that raspberry pi4 is supported (even at an early stage). I can take a look on
|
By
Nikos Karamolegkos
·
#9762
·
|
|
Re: Problematic raspberry support
Nikos, the Fabric team doesn’t do anything to support Raspberry Pi. The commit you’re referencing enables _development_ of Fabric on the new arm64 based M1 macs using the code in the core Fabric
Nikos, the Fabric team doesn’t do anything to support Raspberry Pi. The commit you’re referencing enables _development_ of Fabric on the new arm64 based M1 macs using the code in the core Fabric
|
By
Matthew Sykes
·
#9761
·
|
|
Problematic raspberry support
In latest commits you added support for fabric in raspberry as described here. I am trying so many days to build fabric-chaincode-java without success (the help in the chats or the list
In latest commits you added support for fabric in raspberry as described here. I am trying so many days to build fabric-chaincode-java without success (the help in the chats or the list
|
By
Nikos Karamolegkos
·
#9760
·
|
|
docker run to extract images version
Hello,When I am running docker run --rm hyperledger/fabric-peer:latest peer version the command does not return anything. Why?The command docker run --rm hyperledger/fabric-orderer:latest orderer
Hello,When I am running docker run --rm hyperledger/fabric-peer:latest peer version the command does not return anything. Why?The command docker run --rm hyperledger/fabric-orderer:latest orderer
|
By
Nikos Karamolegkos
·
#9759
·
|