|
Upcoming Event: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere - Fri, 06/19/2020 4:00pm-5:00pm
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When: Friday, 19 June 2020, 4:00pm to 5:00pm, (GMT+01:00) Europe/London
Where:https://zoom.us/j/6223336701
View
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere
When: Friday, 19 June 2020, 4:00pm to 5:00pm, (GMT+01:00) Europe/London
Where:https://zoom.us/j/6223336701
View
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <fabric@...>
·
#8565
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
The second scenario failed due to:
2020-06-19 12:45:35.053 UTC [policies] SignatureSetToValidIdentities -> WARN 0ef signature for identity 0 is invalid: The signature is invalid
How many peers are
The second scenario failed due to:
2020-06-19 12:45:35.053 UTC [policies] SignatureSetToValidIdentities -> WARN 0ef signature for identity 0 is invalid: The signature is invalid
How many peers are
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#8564
·
|
|
Re: How to verify RAFT health in HLF version 1.4.4
#raft
For v1.4.x, there is no metric to check the set of active nodes. Usually, it's adequate to simply ensure that all OSNs are alive and have been online for a reasonable period of time to ensure that
For v1.4.x, there is no metric to check the set of active nodes. Usually, it's adequate to simply ensure that all OSNs are alive and have been online for a reasonable period of time to ensure that
|
By
Jason Yellick <jyellick@...>
·
#8563
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
I have attached the screenshots of the logs from Org1 peer container for your reference, for better readability.
Logs when it worked:
2020-06-19 12:49:09.580 UTC [comm.grpc.server] 1 -> INFO 122
I have attached the screenshots of the logs from Org1 peer container for your reference, for better readability.
Logs when it worked:
2020-06-19 12:49:09.580 UTC [comm.grpc.server] 1 -> INFO 122
|
By
Hritik Gupta <hritikgupta9@...>
·
#8562
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
Curious about this policy,
"endorsementPolicy": { "signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member'), OR('Org2MSP.member')" }
was it accepted as a valid policy? if it was accepted, should this be a bug? what
Curious about this policy,
"endorsementPolicy": { "signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member'), OR('Org2MSP.member')" }
was it accepted as a valid policy? if it was accepted, should this be a bug? what
|
By
email4tong@gmail.com
·
#8561
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
The endorsement policy check only checks which peers have endorsed, not which clients have submitted the transaction. The peer validation logic is deterministic in this regard.
Could you share the
The endorsement policy check only checks which peers have endorsed, not which clients have submitted the transaction. The peer validation logic is deterministic in this regard.
Could you share the
|
By
David Enyeart
·
#8560
·
|
|
Re: Creation of couchdb index on an already running network
#couchdb
#fabric-chaincode
If couchdb returned an error status code while processing the index, we do log the error but chaincode upgrade would succeed irrespective of that. I would suggest to search for the term index to see
If couchdb returned an error status code while processing the index, we do log the error but chaincode upgrade would succeed irrespective of that. I would suggest to search for the term index to see
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8559
·
|
|
Re: Creation of couchdb index on an already running network
#couchdb
#fabric-chaincode
What should I search for in the peer logs?
Some sort of error?
Because I can't see the index on the couchdb entries
What should I search for in the peer logs?
Some sort of error?
Because I can't see the index on the couchdb entries
|
By
Joao Antunes
·
#8558
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
I ran the network again, to double check. The inconsistency issue still exists. The issue occurs even when I pass OR("Org1MSP.Member") as the EP and try to update the key via Org1 client (which is an
I ran the network again, to double check. The inconsistency issue still exists. The issue occurs even when I pass OR("Org1MSP.Member") as the EP and try to update the key via Org1 client (which is an
|
By
Hritik Gupta <hritikgupta9@...>
·
#8557
·
|
|
Re: Creation of couchdb index on an already running network
#couchdb
#fabric-chaincode
Do you have the peer logs?
Regards,
Senthil
Do you have the peer logs?
Regards,
Senthil
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8556
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
the above error seems to match your old definition -- "endorsementPolicy": { "signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member'), OR('Org2MSP.member')" }
Anyway, I do not have expertise in this. If Yacov looks
the above error seems to match your old definition -- "endorsementPolicy": { "signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member'), OR('Org2MSP.member')" }
Anyway, I do not have expertise in this. If Yacov looks
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8555
·
|
|
Creation of couchdb index on an already running network
#couchdb
#fabric-chaincode
Hi,
I currently trying to add a new index to my 1.4 network.
I have the folders correctly set too. When I update the chaincode with the new index folder I can see that my peers have the package
Hi,
I currently trying to add a new index to my 1.4 network.
I have the folders correctly set too. When I update the chaincode with the new index folder I can see that my peers have the package
|
By
Joao Antunes
·
#8554
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
Sorry for typing it wrong. The endorsement policy in my collections config is as follows:
"endorsementPolicy": {
"signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member', 'Org2MSP.member')" }
Setting
Sorry for typing it wrong. The endorsement policy in my collections config is as follows:
"endorsementPolicy": {
"signaturePolicy": "OR('Org1MSP.member', 'Org2MSP.member')" }
Setting
|
By
Hritik Gupta <hritikgupta9@...>
·
#8553
·
|
|
Re: Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
As the memberOnlyWrite is set to false by default (not configured in the collection config as well), all peers are authorized to write if it can satisfy the endorsement policy.
Is the endorsement
As the memberOnlyWrite is set to false by default (not configured in the collection config as well), all peers are authorized to write if it can satisfy the endorsement policy.
Is the endorsement
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8552
·
|
|
Re: How to verify RAFT health in HLF version 1.4.4
#raft
Wouldn't the doc https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.0/operations_service.html help?
Regards,
Senthil
Wouldn't the doc https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.0/operations_service.html help?
Regards,
Senthil
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8551
·
|
|
Inconsistent Private Data Collection Write operation
Hi all,
I have a fabric 2.0 network with 2 orgs having 1 peer each (similar to test-network). I implemented a private data collection that persists in the off-chain DB of the peer of one of the orgs
Hi all,
I have a fabric 2.0 network with 2 orgs having 1 peer each (similar to test-network). I implemented a private data collection that persists in the off-chain DB of the peer of one of the orgs
|
By
Hritik Gupta <hritikgupta9@...>
·
#8550
·
|
|
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Eastern hemisphere - Fri, 06/19/2020
#cal-notice
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Eastern hemisphere
When:
Friday, 19 June 2020
6:00am to 7:00am
(GMT+01:00)
Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Eastern hemisphere
When:
Friday, 19 June 2020
6:00am to 7:00am
(GMT+01:00)
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#8549
·
|
|
Re: How to verify RAFT health in HLF version 1.4.4
#raft
Hi,
Would really appreciate if anybody has any thought/suggestion regarding my query.
Thanks,
Shruti
Hi,
Would really appreciate if anybody has any thought/suggestion regarding my query.
Thanks,
Shruti
|
By
shrugupt@...
·
#8548
·
|
|
Documentation Workgroup: Agenda for Friday, 19 June
Hi All,
We will hold thedocumentation workgroup calls this Friday -- with both an Eastern hemisphereand Western hemisphere call. Please feel free to come along, you're alwaysvery welcome.
You can
Hi All,
We will hold thedocumentation workgroup calls this Friday -- with both an Eastern hemisphereand Western hemisphere call. Please feel free to come along, you're alwaysvery welcome.
You can
|
By
Anthony O'Dowd <a_o-dowd@...>
·
#8547
·
|
|
Re: Replacing CouchDB with a custom database
If you need to expose all features of a database, changes are needed at the database as well as peer code.
if you need to plugin a database that is compatible with what currently Fabric offers, then
If you need to expose all features of a database, changes are needed at the database as well as peer code.
if you need to plugin a database that is compatible with what currently Fabric offers, then
|
By
Senthil Nathan
·
#8546
·
|