Thanks Jason. Could you explain this a bit? What is a source address? Whose source address?

Transactions are placed into blocks, by the consensus plugin. So, for Raft, you'll see this done

Just for confirmation - spoke with Marek on rocketchat, and the fix for FABCJ-285 will resolve this... will look to put our a patch release in the coming week. Regards, Matthew. Matthew B White

Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere When: Friday, 15 May 2020 4:00pm to 5:00pm (GMT+01:00)

Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Western hemisphere When: Friday, 15 May 2020, 4:00pm to 5:00pm, (GMT+01:00) Europe/London Where:https://zoom.us/j/6223336701 View

Gari, thank you for your answer. I am answering inline. Modify the following - keep reading please. Agreed. However, I think that after the transactions are sent to the

The address you are seeing there is the source address and port, not the port the service is listening on. It's also normal to see those warnings about consenter errors shortly after channel creation

What are you trying / hoping to do? There is no "policy" per se and strictly speaking there is no guarantee that the transactions will be ordered in the exact order in which they were sent. That

Hi, according to orderer documentation, in phase two the "the ordering service puts the transactions into a strict order". Where in the orderer's code (or anywhere else) is

Hi Matthew, Thank you! I think I’m still not using that fix, the problem with the time is constant since I remember, it’s just depended on what the data volume is. The weirds thing is that

Hi, I want to intercept an invoke call (fab1.4, first-network, disabled tls, working on CLI). My idea was to to make use of burp/mitmproxy (listening at 127.0.0.8080) to intercept the invoke call to

Hello; let me have a look at your repo... just to double check it couldn't be the perf issue fixes this week? Regards, Matthew. Matthew B White IBM Blockchain Solutions Architect Email me at

Hello guys, Sorry for being such a pain in the ass, but could one please help with that darn performance issue ? I have tried to strip down my chaincode and do a copy-past of what the FabCar java

Hello wonderful people, I hope all are doing well. As a beginner, I have a confusion that came to me while writing docker-compose files to build my own network. There is an env variable in the orderer

Hyperledger Fabric Documentation Workgroup call - Eastern hemisphere When: Friday, 15 May 2020 6:00am to 7:00am (GMT+01:00)

we have a network of Raft orderers. when we tried to created a channel we saw these warnings in the logs 2020-05-14 11:38:52.521 PDT [common.deliver] deliverBlocks -> WARN 04d [channel: tracktrace]

Hyperledger Fabric and Fabric CA v1.4.7 are now available. See details of the included fixes in the release

Thanks for the flag Chris, I'll look into that, though I am not (yet) trying Kubernetes, just using the out-of-the-box fabcar example from fabric-samples. Do you think this might be related to the

I always recommend reading the docs in the Hyperledger Fabric CA section which has been updated recently. Additionally, I have a video tutorial on YouTube

You are not in the client binary directory when issuing the command. You can fix this by exporting the FABRIC_CA_CLIENT_HOME variable and run the command again. This used to get me too, so we updated