So, in the case of a network across 2 k8s clusters, I have to make all orderer nodes accessible outside of k8s, and put the public host names and ports in the genesis block. Correct? K8s is still a

This is precisely why k8s and p2p are never a good match. K8s simply breaks far too many networking rfcs. It is suitable for asymmetric client/server microservices or stacks, and even then a tiny

The idea of anchor peer is providing information about other peers in the same organization. There is no need for a peer to be completely public but it should be at least accessible by other peers

If I have 2 orgs contributing orderer nodes using etcd raft consensus, and each org runs its nodes in its own Kubernetes cluster. How can I make Raft work across these 2 orgs? I guess that every

Many thanks Brian, this is helpful and very much appreciated! Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:56 PM,

Thanks for the reply. also adding another link to this thread about same question:

Modest insights ahead, and IANAM (I am not a maintainer): Both seem like non-trivial lifts, so be sure that you really need each of them. There is emerging and improving

Can anyone help? Even modest insights would be appreciated. Thanks Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 8:43

FYI issue raised here https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-17110 Regards, Matthew. Matthew B White IBM Blockchain Solutions Architect Email me at WHITEMAT@... Find me on StackOverflow, and

Hello; could you give me some more info please about how you're sending transactions. Do you have the chaincode logs for example? Or post to rocketchat #fabric-chaincode-java and we can discuss

After upgrading to 1.4.4 i receive the following error in my chaincode logs: `transaction returned with failure: Failed to submit task for processing` I'm sending transactions in a multithread

1. It might leak sensitive information of the user inside the certificate For concern of sensitive information in certificate, you could consider use idemix as a ZKP 2. It is hard to handle the

I followed the tutorial “Adding an Org to a channel”. The new org works, but it does not seem to have an anchor peer defined. How should I update it to include definition of an anchor peer for

Remember that blockchains are decentralized ledgers. What you've done here is essentially tampered/corrupted your own local peer's state database so that it is not in sync with the blockchain blocks.

Dear Brett Logan, Thank for your answer, related to fine-grained access control by adding attributes to identity of the user I found that: 1. It might leak sensitive information of the user inside the

Hi Tong, I'm currently investigating the issue and trying to replicate it. I'll give an update when I reach a conclusion.

Hi, I think you are changing the world state and not the ledger itself. Are you storing the database locally (through a volume)? If yes, then the container is reloading CouchDB dataset And if you

There is a finite set of resources you can place an ACL on using the following documentation: https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.4/access_control.html To create more

If you have more info, eg. version, it would be easier to get more useful info from community.-- This is my life,but world of us~~

Dear all, In Hyperledger Composer Access Control List is define in a file.acl, Where is the equivalent access control list in Hyperledger Fabric to the one in Composer? Bests,