I think you might have missed one of the points on how you can actually pass in a salt value to all endorsing peers. Proposal (endorsement) requests have a "transient" field which can be used. The

thanks for reply but I think you guys are down playing the seriousness of this issue. if u add salt then the salt must be passed to others so others can validate. to avoid others to launch

I am trying to setup fabric network using external-ca and so I have to register and enroll certs for all the peers and clients and for registration of certificates LDAP server is being used. After

Hi Alok. Check this JIRA https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-7352 Regards, Soumya

Hi Expecting you to help us in this R&D task. 4 Kafkas and 3 Zookeepers are distributed in 2 of our servers. The kafkas' and zookeepers' names are changed. Then, we edited and updated the

Hi all, I've read some docs that Transaction Certificates(TCerts) are not supported - replaced by Idemix - from Fabric 1.x . But there are still remain TCerts related codes in the latest release of

FabToken was removed from Fabric. The reasoning surrounding that decision can be found here: https://lists.hyperledger.org/g/fabric/message/6228 Brett Logan Software Engineer, IBM

Hello everyone, I noticed in Fabric Alpha release, Fabcoin functionality is added, however it is not recommended to be used in production. There is a need for Fabcoin in my senario, is there any plan

I managed to get past that error and go on to another. Instead of the path, I passed the certificate and got: Error: Unable to initialize channel. Attempted to contact 1 Peers. Last error was Error:

Hey, Having an issue with the node sdk gateway connect for about 4 days now. This is the code that is attempting to connect with the peer with TLS enabled const connectionOptions:

+1, and the Python SDK plans to migrate, too. Thanks! -- Best wishes! Baohua Yang

Hello; In recent weeks there have been discussions on the contributors' calls, and also in RocketChat, about the location of the Fabric repos, and the build pipelines. The fabric-samples

Thanks for replying Yacov and Senthil. You're right that since the introduction of private data, Fabric recommends that private data be salted to avoid dictionary attacks. As this thread makes clear

On blowing it up we see its a fabric-samples/fabcar screen shot showing "golang" and what appears to be an error during chaincode build process. Also interesting that this appears to run in

Hi All, Fabric- v1.4.3 (RAFT Orderer Set UP) Created a custom policy and added to the application policies , when am trying to do a channel update, every time a different error is coming up like as

Hi Ivan, Thank you for bringing this. We have discussed about including salt in the private data design document --

Hi Ivan. If you have a chaincode that requiresmore than 1 organization to endorse the transaction, you need the executionof both chaincodes to produce the same results, so the hashes of the

PrivateData is marketed as a data privacy solution in Hyperledger Fabric. Unfortunately, this is just another serious security hole somehow went under the radar, and all projects using this function

Hi - Can't really see the details in the screen shot... is this Java chaincode? If so check the rocketchat channel fabric-chaincode-java for discussion on what could be the issue Regards,

Hi, I was running the command ./startFabric.sh but I was getting the following error. I’m not able to Instantiate the chaincode..... any help? Thanks, Marina Sent from