|
Re: Mutual TLS Issue
#fabric
#fabric-ca
Hi Jean,
What is the fabric version and the order type (kafka or raft) .
Also can you attach the docker composefiles of your peer and orderers?
Regards,
Soumya
Hi Jean,
What is the fabric version and the order type (kafka or raft) .
Also can you attach the docker composefiles of your peer and orderers?
Regards,
Soumya
|
By
soumya nayak <soumyarjnnayak@...>
·
#6860
·
|
|
Re: Raft - Multiple Orderers - LevelDB Error
Yes of course. Here it is
rca.example:
container_name: rca.example.com
image: hyperledger/fabric-ca:1.4.3
command: sh -c 'fabric-ca-server start -d -b admin:adminpw --port 7054
Yes of course. Here it is
rca.example:
container_name: rca.example.com
image: hyperledger/fabric-ca:1.4.3
command: sh -c 'fabric-ca-server start -d -b admin:adminpw --port 7054
|
By
Nicholas Leonardi
·
#6859
·
|
|
Re: Mutual TLS Issue
#fabric
#fabric-ca
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a one way TLS instead of a mutual one. So on my peers and orderer, the flags *_TLS_CLIENTAUTHREQUIRED are all set to false.
When starting the network, everything seems to go
Hi,
I'm trying to set up a one way TLS instead of a mutual one. So on my peers and orderer, the flags *_TLS_CLIENTAUTHREQUIRED are all set to false.
When starting the network, everything seems to go
|
By
Jean-Gaël Dominé <jgdomine@...>
·
#6858
·
|
|
Re: "bad certificate"
#fabric-ca
#fabricca
#fabric-questions
Hi Nicholas,
the fabric-ca-server-config.yaml is set as follows:
tls:
# Enable TLS (default: false)
enabled: false
# TLS for the server's listening port
certfile:
keyfile:
clientauth:
Hi Nicholas,
the fabric-ca-server-config.yaml is set as follows:
tls:
# Enable TLS (default: false)
enabled: false
# TLS for the server's listening port
certfile:
keyfile:
clientauth:
|
By
Marco Ippolito
·
#6857
·
|
|
Re: "bad certificate"
#fabric-ca
#fabricca
#fabric-questions
Hi Nicholas,
thanks for answering.
I'm trying to follow step-by-step the instructions described here: https://hyperledger-fabric-ca.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.4/users-guide.html#fabric-ca-server
Hi Nicholas,
thanks for answering.
I'm trying to follow step-by-step the instructions described here: https://hyperledger-fabric-ca.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.4/users-guide.html#fabric-ca-server
|
By
Marco Ippolito
·
#6856
·
|
|
Re: "bad certificate"
#fabric-ca
#fabricca
#fabric-questions
Please give us more details on what you're trying to do. Are you just starting the server and it gives the error? Are you trying to enroll/register with fabric-ca-client?
Get BlueMail for Android
On
Please give us more details on what you're trying to do. Are you just starting the server and it gives the error? Are you trying to enroll/register with fabric-ca-client?
Get BlueMail for Android
On
|
By
Nicholas Leonardi
·
#6855
·
|
|
"bad certificate"
#fabric-ca
#fabricca
#fabric-questions
Affer removing the previous cert and key files, I started again the fabric-ca server discovering that new cert and key files were created:
(base) marco@pc:~/fabric/fabric-ca$ fabric-ca-server start
Affer removing the previous cert and key files, I started again the fabric-ca server discovering that new cert and key files were created:
(base) marco@pc:~/fabric/fabric-ca$ fabric-ca-server start
|
By
Marco Ippolito
·
#6854
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Hyperledger Fabric Quarterly Update Due #tsc-project-update - Thu, 10/03/2019
#tsc-project-update
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Quarterly Update Due #tsc-project-update
When: Thursday, 3 October 2019
View Event
Organizer: community-architects@...
Description: The Hyperledger Fabric
Reminder: Hyperledger Fabric Quarterly Update Due #tsc-project-update
When: Thursday, 3 October 2019
View Event
Organizer: community-architects@...
Description: The Hyperledger Fabric
|
By
fabric@lists.hyperledger.org Calendar <fabric@...>
·
#6853
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
As Will mentioned and I put up earlier, that if you are using CLI 'CORE_PEER_ADDRESS' is where you are executing the command **from**, I get that you don't want any peer to execute any command ,
As Will mentioned and I put up earlier, that if you are using CLI 'CORE_PEER_ADDRESS' is where you are executing the command **from**, I get that you don't want any peer to execute any command ,
|
By
Anil Singh <anil.singh@...>
·
#6852
·
|
|
Re: how to use the peer chaincode invoke CLI with smart contracts introduced in 1.4
Hello Siddaharth,
you can specify the name of smart contract in command parameter -n
and
-c as parameter to chaindcode :
peer chaincode invoke -o orderer.example.com:7050 -C mychannel -n
Hello Siddaharth,
you can specify the name of smart contract in command parameter -n
and
-c as parameter to chaindcode :
peer chaincode invoke -o orderer.example.com:7050 -C mychannel -n
|
By
Labib Farag Labib
·
#6851
·
|
|
how to use the peer chaincode invoke CLI with smart contracts introduced in 1.4
Hello,
How do we specify what smart contract needs to be executed when using the peer chaincode invoke CLI in v1.4?
Hello,
How do we specify what smart contract needs to be executed when using the peer chaincode invoke CLI in v1.4?
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#6850
·
|
|
Re: Raft - Multiple Orderers - LevelDB Error
I think we'd need to see the entire compose file here
-----------------------------------------
Gari Singh
Distinguished Engineer, CTO - IBM Blockchain
IBM Middleware
550 King St
Littleton, MA
I think we'd need to see the entire compose file here
-----------------------------------------
Gari Singh
Distinguished Engineer, CTO - IBM Blockchain
IBM Middleware
550 King St
Littleton, MA
|
By
Gari Singh <garis@...>
·
#6849
·
|
|
Re: Raft - Multiple Orderers - LevelDB Error
I tried that. Same problem. Also, in the fabric samples they use the same working directories. I also noticed they use the same orderer Genesis block for all 3 which I'm also doing.
If I remove the
I tried that. Same problem. Also, in the fabric samples they use the same working directories. I also noticed they use the same orderer Genesis block for all 3 which I'm also doing.
If I remove the
|
By
Nicholas Leonardi
·
#6848
·
|
|
Re: Raft - Multiple Orderers - LevelDB Error
They all need different working directories. They can’t share leveldb files for obvious reasons.
They all need different working directories. They can’t share leveldb files for obvious reasons.
|
By
Nye Liu <nye@...>
·
#6847
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
Ok thanks. We'll try it with 1.4 and report if we run into the issue again.
From: William T Lahti <wtlahti@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:04 PM
To: siddjain@... <siddjain@...>
Cc:
Ok thanks. We'll try it with 1.4 and report if we run into the issue again.
From: William T Lahti <wtlahti@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:04 PM
To: siddjain@... <siddjain@...>
Cc:
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#6846
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
Right, as I mentioned, it appears to be caused by the same bug. There was some bad error logic in that code (that I was responsible for adding a number of years back) that could lead to the panic you
Right, as I mentioned, it appears to be caused by the same bug. There was some bad error logic in that code (that I was responsible for adding a number of years back) that could lead to the panic you
|
By
Will Lahti
·
#6845
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
we are using 1.3 of Fabric. The error is similar to that bug although that bug is regarding a CORE_PEER_TLS flag
also see inline. thanks:
From: William T Lahti <wtlahti@...>
Sent: Wednesday,
we are using 1.3 of Fabric. The error is similar to that bug although that bug is regarding a CORE_PEER_TLS flag
also see inline. thanks:
From: William T Lahti <wtlahti@...>
Sent: Wednesday,
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#6844
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
Can you clarify which version of Fabric you're using? This appears to be caused by the same bug you reported in https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-15506, which was fixed in v1.4.2.
In regards
Can you clarify which version of Fabric you're using? This appears to be caused by the same bug you reported in https://jira.hyperledger.org/browse/FAB-15506, which was fixed in v1.4.2.
In regards
|
By
Will Lahti
·
#6843
·
|
|
Raft - Multiple Orderers - LevelDB Error
Hey guys,
I'm trying to deploy 3 orderers on the same organization and machine.
I can't seem to get it working, two orderers gives me this error:
panic: Error opening leveldb: resource temporarily
Hey guys,
I'm trying to deploy 3 orderers on the same organization and machine.
I can't seem to get it working, two orderers gives me this error:
panic: Error opening leveldb: resource temporarily
|
By
Nicholas Leonardi
·
#6842
·
|
|
Re: What is the purpose of CORE_PEER_ADDRESS when chaincode is being invoked on multiple peers?
Sorry, I have no idea what this means. Some examples would be helpful. As stated in the question we are running thepeer chaincode invoke command (say on Joe's machine) to invoke chaincode on remote
Sorry, I have no idea what this means. Some examples would be helpful. As stated in the question we are running thepeer chaincode invoke command (say on Joe's machine) to invoke chaincode on remote
|
By
Siddharth Jain
·
#6841
·
|