|
Fabric Maintainers Meeting
We'll have our next bi-weekly maintainers meeting tomorrow Apr 25 at 9 am ET.
zoom link to follow.
Agenda will be to review progress against our epics and decide on any items to defer to 1.3. We can
We'll have our next bi-weekly maintainers meeting tomorrow Apr 25 at 9 am ET.
zoom link to follow.
Agenda will be to review progress against our epics and decide on any items to defer to 1.3. We can
|
By
Christopher Ferris
·
#3479
·
|
|
Re: issue installing samples, binaries and docker images for 1.1.0
#fabric
The link you are using for the script is actually the Github rendering of the file not the raw file itself.
You should use
The link you are using for the script is actually the Github rendering of the file not the raw file itself.
You should use
|
By
Gari Singh <garis@...>
·
#3478
·
|
|
issue installing samples, binaries and docker images for 1.1.0
#fabric
Hey all. I am trying to install the binaries etc. but am having some issues.
I have tried installing using the goo.gl shortened url without success, so instead am using the full path:
curl -sSL
Hey all. I am trying to install the binaries etc. but am having some issues.
I have tried installing using the goo.gl shortened url without success, so instead am using the full path:
curl -sSL
|
By
precocious.music@...
·
#3477
·
|
|
Re: Org setup on type of users
Hello Ivan,
Thanks for the response and explanation just one query against the response is that "If different users are sharing the ORG_instance then wont it would violate the Isolation feature over
Hello Ivan,
Thanks for the response and explanation just one query against the response is that "If different users are sharing the ORG_instance then wont it would violate the Isolation feature over
|
By
Sunil Suseelan <sunil.suseelan@...>
·
#3476
·
|
|
Re: Org setup on type of users
Hello Sunil,
this is a very good question with no clear answer. The decision must be made in context of the current problem and implementation.
If you put every producer as individual org, then
Hello Sunil,
this is a very good question with no clear answer. The decision must be made in context of the current problem and implementation.
If you put every producer as individual org, then
|
By
Ivan Vankov
·
#3475
·
|
|
Re: the question of nonce included in the signatureHeader struct and epoch included in the channelHeader struct
Hi Zhipeng,
Blocks are validated and committed in sequence. In the scenario you described, B will fail. The committer should not be able to validate block N+1 without block N committed. Apart from
Hi Zhipeng,
Blocks are validated and committed in sequence. In the scenario you described, B will fail. The committer should not be able to validate block N+1 without block N committed. Apart from
|
By
Xixue Jia
·
#3474
·
|
|
Re: the question of nonce included in the signatureHeader struct and epoch included in the channelHeader struct
Hi, Jia:
Thanks for your answers, but I think it is not enough to detect replay attacks that just checking the format of TxIds;
In the v1.1.0-fabric, checking duplicate TxIds in two case:
(1) To
Hi, Jia:
Thanks for your answers, but I think it is not enough to detect replay attacks that just checking the format of TxIds;
In the v1.1.0-fabric, checking duplicate TxIds in two case:
(1) To
|
By
??? <wangzhipengxlj@...>
·
#3473
·
|
|
Re: the question of nonce included in the signatureHeader struct and epoch included in the channelHeader struct
Hi, Jia:
Thanks for your answers, but I think it is not enough to detect replay attacks that just checking the format of TxIds;
In the v1.1.0-fabric, checking duplicate TxIds in two case:
(1)
Hi, Jia:
Thanks for your answers, but I think it is not enough to detect replay attacks that just checking the format of TxIds;
In the v1.1.0-fabric, checking duplicate TxIds in two case:
(1)
|
By
??? <wangzhipengxlj@...>
·
#3472
·
|
|
Org setup on type of users
Hello Folks,
I have one query regarding the real world scenario, In there we would be having many users that play same role eg: In supply chain we may have many producers/Grower's(referring to
Hello Folks,
I have one query regarding the real world scenario, In there we would be having many users that play same role eg: In supply chain we may have many producers/Grower's(referring to
|
By
sunil suseelan <sunil18031992@...>
·
#3471
·
|
|
Re: How number of peers vs number of orgs in a channel weighs in the endorsement
Thanks very much Yacov for your response.
Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@...
"Yacov" ---04/23/2018 09:47:11 AM---You can specify any number of signatures from each organization
Thanks very much Yacov for your response.
Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
litong01@...
"Yacov" ---04/23/2018 09:47:11 AM---You can specify any number of signatures from each organization
|
By
Tong Li
·
#3470
·
|
|
Re: How number of peers vs number of orgs in a channel weighs in the endorsement
You can specify any number of signaturesfrom each organization to be in the endorsement policy.
Such as: "2 signatures from orgA" and "1 signature from org B"
From: "Tong Li"<litong01@...>
To:
You can specify any number of signaturesfrom each organization to be in the endorsement policy.
Such as: "2 signatures from orgA" and "1 signature from org B"
From: "Tong Li"<litong01@...>
To:
|
By
Yacov
·
#3469
·
|
|
How number of peers vs number of orgs in a channel weighs in the endorsement
Say there are 3 orgs in a channel, A,B and C. Org A has 5 peers and B and C have 2 peers each. Will the endorsement policy of majority favors the org A over other two orgs since they have the most
Say there are 3 orgs in a channel, A,B and C. Org A has 5 peers and B and C have 2 peers each. Will the endorsement policy of majority favors the org A over other two orgs since they have the most
|
By
Tong Li
·
#3468
·
|
|
Re: output
I am not sure why the GOPATH you have set is not used by the platform while building the chaincode. I use the following set of instructions which I created from the links mentioned in
I am not sure why the GOPATH you have set is not used by the platform while building the chaincode. I use the following set of instructions which I created from the links mentioned in
|
By
Vigneswaran R
·
#3467
·
|
|
Documentation Workgroup: BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK concept topic - Daily meetings continue this week
We're continue the Documentation Workgroupmeetings this week, focusing on the Blockchain network topic:
Thanks to Chris Gabriel for his updateslast week -- we need to focus this week to get the topic
We're continue the Documentation Workgroupmeetings this week, focusing on the Blockchain network topic:
Thanks to Chris Gabriel for his updateslast week -- we need to focus this week to get the topic
|
By
Anthony O'Dowd <a_o-dowd@...>
·
#3466
·
|
|
Re: [Hyperledger-fabric] [technical-discuss] concurrency execution of transactions problem!
Kim - are there any details publicly availableon this (e.g. JIRA ticket): " there is work goingon to allow classification of a transaction as idempotent or pseudo-idempotent"?
Also, some of these use
Kim - are there any details publicly availableon this (e.g. JIRA ticket): " there is work goingon to allow classification of a transaction as idempotent or pseudo-idempotent"?
Also, some of these use
|
By
Imre Kocsis
·
#3465
·
|
|
Re: output
I tried creating a symlink to /usr/local/go from /opt/go and when that didn’t work, I moved /usr/local/go to /opt/go, and am getting a different error. My Q is why we should change the default
I tried creating a symlink to /usr/local/go from /opt/go and when that didn’t work, I moved /usr/local/go to /opt/go, and am getting a different error. My Q is why we should change the default
|
By
Kamal R. Prasad
·
#3464
·
|
|
Re: is there a reason for persistent, uninformative build failures?
I added a comment to the actual CR reference below prior to actually seeing this.
The reason for this CR failure is because the CI script runs "byfn -m ...." and you removed the "-m" option.
This
I added a comment to the actual CR reference below prior to actually seeing this.
The reason for this CR failure is because the CI script runs "byfn -m ...." and you removed the "-m" option.
This
|
By
Gari Singh <garis@...>
·
#3463
·
|
|
Re: output
From the above lines, we can understand that the build system is expecting 'fabric' under either "/opt/go/src/github.com/hyperledger" or under
From the above lines, we can understand that the build system is expecting 'fabric' under either "/opt/go/src/github.com/hyperledger" or under
|
By
Vigneswaran R
·
#3462
·
|
|
Re: output
Hi!
The website asks one to set GOROOT. Anyways, even after i set GOPATH, I am still facing an error. Pl see output below with info on my
Hi!
The website asks one to set GOROOT. Anyways, even after i set GOPATH, I am still facing an error. Pl see output below with info on my
|
By
Kamal R. Prasad
·
#3461
·
|
|
Re: output
It seems, fabric source code is not in the expected location. Please move the cloned fabric directory (or create a symbolic link to it) under the following location,
It seems, fabric source code is not in the expected location. Please move the cloned fabric directory (or create a symbolic link to it) under the following location,
|
By
Vigneswaran R
·
#3460
·
|