When the user or context specified organization does not exist in the channel being queried via command 'minifab channelquery -c [the channel] ' minifab will add the organization to the channel. This

Private Chaincode Lab When: 09/13/2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles Where: https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community.3?pwd=UE90WHhEaHRqOGEyMkV3cldKa2d2dz09 Organizer: Marcus

As a application owner and contract developer, you have the flexibility to define the structure of ledger data. You can handle it based on application needs in the contract/chaincode method which is

Or to package only if a new chaincode name/label is created. Thus, to keep the same package when I just update a chaincode (i.e only increase the sequence number, and sync with the new docker image

Thank you. It is a bit confusing with the chaincode name and chaincode label. Nevertheless, is it bad to package each time the chaincode before the deployment? Even the chaincode name is the same?

Hi , You can check the Identity section of the documentation: https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/identity/identity.html and in particular the section Certificate Revocation Lists. How

Hi, all. I was just wondering the HLF blockchain network able to "un-registering that already registered to CA" or can't. anyone have an idea about that? If so, please let me know and I will be really

Hello, The label is packaged with the chaincode, and is used to prefix a sha hash of the packaged file this makes the “packageid” (aka “chaincodeid”). The chaincode name isn’t in

Also, If I have already packaged my chaincode to tar.gz file with PACKAGE_ID= abcdf and I would like to use the same chaincode to a new channel (same chaincode functionality but different chaincode

Private Chaincode Lab When: 09/06/2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles Where: https://zoom.us/my/hyperledger.community.3?pwd=UE90WHhEaHRqOGEyMkV3cldKa2d2dz09 Organizer: Marcus

I think it is better to get the second option. I don't know which builder I am using. I deploy the chaincode as a service

Hello; Could you just confirm which chaincode builder you are using? There are a few different ones😊 Essentially I think you’ve two options Use the same chaincode docker image, but

function or parameter? Can you give me an example?

why not just pass the parameter as a function into the same chaincode? From: fabric@... <fabric@...> on behalf of Nikos Karamolegkos <nkaram@...> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2022 11:42 AM To:

I am using hlf-operator with the chaincode builder. Thank you for your proposals. So I have to keep one chaincode pod per channel although the functionality of the chaincodes are the same. Correct?

Hi Fabric Community, I'm exploring the offline transaction signing flow in hyperledger fabric by using Fabric Node SDK. I came across the following official tutorial.

Hi Shweta, Yes, The solution works with fabric 2.4+, be careful, There should be at least one peer who has access to the full ledger. Also, go through the limitation. The major limitation is that you

Reminder: Documentation Workgroup monthly call When: 09/02/2022 11:00am to 12:00pm (UTC-04:00) America/New

Hi Nikos, Sharing the CCaaS endpoint across multiple channels is asking for trouble. It _may_ work, but it seems like it's an invitation for unexpected problems if and when the states collide across

Pls confirm if below solution works for hlf 2.4 as i have gone throgh https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.3/peer_ledger_snapshot.html Assumption: Lets we have 20000 blocks in