Re: Privacy within a channel - multi members
Brett T Logan <brett.t.logan@...>
I'm not sure I understand the use case. If you have some transaction that the other members on your channel should in no way be party to or have knowledge of, you should have a separate channel on which the parties who have stake in that transaction belong to.
In what scenario would you want to completely exclude the knowledge of a transaction existing entirely when all members have agreed to participate in the consortium? By not including the transaction in a subset of ledgers, you've forked the chain as your ledgers don't hash to the same values as they don't include the same transactions.
----- Original message -----
|
|