Our intent has been to split Fabric docs into its own repository after the transition to GitHub and Azure Pipelines. We only have one more repository to switch over (fabric-test), then will proceed with the documentation split. If anybody would like to drive the documentation split in parallel, that would certainly expedite things.

I'd suggest that we identify the top documentation contributors and reviewers to seed the fabric docs repository maintainer list in the coming weeks (including Chris and Joe), rather than pulling the trigger in the Fabric repository this week.


Dave Enyeart

"Pam Andrejko" ---11/25/2019 05:26:48 PM---All, I would like to nominate two new Documentation maintainers for the Hyperledger Fabric project.

From: "Pam Andrejko" <pama@...>
To: fabric@...
Date: 11/25/2019 05:26 PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Hyperledger Fabric] Maintainer nominations
Sent by: fabric@...

---

All,

I would like to nominate two new Documentation maintainers for the Hyperledger Fabric project. They are Chris Gabriel (Hyperchain Labs) and Joe Alewine (IBM).

Chris has been an instrumental member of the Documentation community workgroup for several years now. In addition to being a regular content reviewer and contributor, he is a consumer of Fabric in his own Hyperchain Labs business that he founded. The insights, perspective, and content that he's provided based on his experience have been invaluable to the documentation work group and Fabric community as a whole.

Joe has been providing important Fabric documentation for over two and half years, is recognized as an expert on the ordering service, the Fabric upgrade process and channel capabilities, and was recently recognized as a Hyperledger significant contributor.

Adding two more Documentation Maintainers will greatly facilitate the addition and approval of Fabric documentation content going forward.

I have opened a separate PR for each nomination:

Chris Gabriel - https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/pull/317
Joe Alewine - https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric/pull/316

I'm requesting that existing maintainers review the nominations and indicate whether they agree with a comment in the PR. Other’s are welcome to provide their input.

Warm regards,
Pam Andrejko