Thanks for the reply from Brett Logan that,
As the above reply, does it mean that it is okay if the chaincode log doesn't include sensitive information? I have following questions from Brett's reply,
1. The peer of other orgs cannot be controlled by my org, so that I couldn't know if other peers configuration is "CORE_VM_DOCKER_ATTACHSTDOUT=
2. Could it still have sensitive information appeared in the log of a chaincode container, if I didn't implement any logging functions? Could you explain more details of the probable data leakage from chaincode logging?
3. If the malicious actors who could replace my chaincode, they can just get the log from chaincode containers which running in their peers, even they could use the malicious chaincode to grab any data they want, that shouldn't be the problem of logging, but the security problem of Hyperledger Fabric authentication and endorsement?