Re: [hyperledger/fabric] Remove chaincode instance variables from example chaincodes (#1981)


Brian Behlendorf <bbehlendorf@...>
 

+1 to "spent elsewhere", is POR being tracked somewhere?

Brian

On 06/24/2016 12:44 PM, Ry Jones wrote:
If there is something off-the-shelf that can do it, sure. Given that the POR is to migrate to Gerrit/Jira in the next month, I assert the effort building scaffolding around GitHub is better spent elsewhere.

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Sheehan Anderson <sheehan@...> wrote:

Completely agree that it's a firehose at this point and too much information for a person to reasonably track. While I believe GitHub issues are the best place to hold discussions, I recognize the same "how to surface the architecture conversations" problem. I've seen a few major open source projects on GitHub use a "big picture" label on important issues. Perhaps we could use the same label and write a bot that collects these once per week and sends a collection of links to the mailing list? People could then subscribe to those particular issues and receive updates via email.



_______________________________________________
Hyperledger-fabric mailing list
Hyperledger-fabric@...
https://lists.hyperledger.org/mailman/listinfo/hyperledger-fabric


-- 
Brian Behlendorf
Executive Director at the Hyperledger Project
bbehlendorf@...
Twitter: @brianbehlendorf

Join fabric@lists.hyperledger.org to automatically receive all group messages.