The minutes from today's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#august_21st_2017 -Clive

The minutes from Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#august_7th_2017 TL;DR Brian Behlendorf dropped in and encourage

The minutes from last Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#july_24th_2017 Of note: Requirements for "After-t

Hi Oskar, see my comments below, marked with AF. Apologies for the delay. Work. Have a great weekend. Cheers, Andreas Dear Andreas Freund, Thank you for your comment below, which I have received via G

Hi Clive, all, The document “After-the-fact mandate changes” was discussed in detail in the Hyperledger Identity working group. There were ten participants, including a person from Hyperledger Indy. T

Dear Steve Anon and Andreas Freund, Thank you for your comments, which I received via Google Docs. The Hyperledger Requirements WG (this email list) is the proper place to discuss these comments, henc

Dear Andreas Freund, Thank you for your comment below, which I have received via Google Docs. As noted in my response to you in the Google Doc, the place to discuss fundamental requirements issues is

The minutes from Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#july_10th_2017 In particular we need reviewers familia

Hi Clive, all, I have just updated the document "After-the-fact mandate changes" (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psJc9UWuteSzOqIG0VLIdzdlxFb9kq-Csw-dxcjPzEo), incorporating the comments received

The minutes from [last] Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#june_26th_2017 Domain experts please review the

Dear friends of the Hyperledger RequirementsWG, Here is a first draft of the use case on “After-the-fact mandate changes”. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psJc9UWuteSzOqIG0VLIdzdlxFb9kq-Csw-dxcjPz

The minutes from Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes?&#june_12th_2017 -Clive

Requirements WG - 10:00 AM PT every other Monday - Next call June 12 (since May 29 is a federal holiday in the US). https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg Recently we've refi

The minutes from Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#may_15_2017 Please take our survey http://bit.ly/2pKKa

HI Folks, Here is the final cut buttoned up. Please move the use case to Milestone 2 and paste the link in the Use Case area as discussed https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByXQX8kO1iErck5KRl8yaUlyQWc

Hi Folks, Please provide any commentary you have on this version by Wednesday. I added an abstract and some additional information about insurance, SLAs and hard asset linkage to the document, page 1,

The minutes from Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes?&#may_1_2017 Highlights: Oleg - confidential transacti

Hi Folks, The document link follows. There were a number of good comments provided in the document's critique by Clive, Mahesh and Oleg. I have left the critique embedded in the document and tried to

From: hyperledger-requirements-wg-bounces@... [mailto:hyperledger-requirements-wg-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Deventer, M.O. (Oskar) van Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 9:16 AM To: clive boulton <clive.bo

The minutes from Monday's Requirements Working Group bi-weekly are here: https://wiki.hyperledger.org/groups/requirements/requirements-wg/minutes#april_17th Please provide feedback to the ReqWG on fea