1. Topics
  2. Draft Hyperledger Use Case: After-the-fact mandate changes

Draft Hyperledger Use Case: After-the-fact mandate changes

Deventer, M.O. (Oskar) van <oskar.vandeventer@...>
 

Dear friends of the Hyperledger RequirementsWG,

 

Here is a first draft of the use case on “After-the-fact mandate changes”.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psJc9UWuteSzOqIG0VLIdzdlxFb9kq-Csw-dxcjPzEo/edit

 

Please read, review and comment on the draft use case.

  • Is this a use case that is already covered by the Hyperledger project somewhere?
  • Should the Hyperledger project consider this use case?
  • Any comments and suggestions to improve and further articulate this use case or the associated requirements?

 

Best regards,

 

Oskar

 

 

 

Dr. ir. M.O. (Oskar) van Deventer
Senior Scientist Blockchain Technologies
Networks Department

T +31 (0)88 866 70 78
M +31 (0)65 191 49 18
E oskar.vandeventer@...

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

 

 
Deventer, M.O. (Oskar) van <oskar.vandeventer@...>
 

Dear friends of the Hyperledger RequirementsWG,

 

There were some questions about mutability of the blockchain at the Requirements WG call of Monday 16 June, triggered by the draft “After-the-fact mandate changes” (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psJc9UWuteSzOqIG0VLIdzdlxFb9kq-Csw-dxcjPzEo/edit). It was concluded that mutability was not needed of even desirable, as the signing over of an authorization/mandate should not require any rewriting or erasing of the past.

 

Hence, we added a fourth requirement: “The solution to requirements 1 and 2 shall not require mutability of the blockchain”.

 

Please let me know if you have any further comments or suggestions to the document. Thank you!

 

Best regards,

 

Oskar

 

 

 

From: hyperledger-requirements-wg-bounces@... [mailto:hyperledger-requirements-wg-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Deventer, M.O. (Oskar) van
Sent: Friday, 09 June, 2017 09:40
To: hyperledger-requirements-wg@...
Subject: [Hyperledger-Requirements-WG] Draft Hyperledger Use Case: After-the-fact mandate changes

 

Dear friends of the Hyperledger RequirementsWG,

 

Here is a first draft of the use case on “After-the-fact mandate changes”.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1psJc9UWuteSzOqIG0VLIdzdlxFb9kq-Csw-dxcjPzEo/edit

 

Please read, review and comment on the draft use case.

  • Is this a use case that is already covered by the Hyperledger project somewhere?
  • Should the Hyperledger project consider this use case?
  • Any comments and suggestions to improve and further articulate this use case or the associated requirements?

 

Best regards,

 

Oskar

 

 

 

Dr. ir. M.O. (Oskar) van Deventer
Senior Scientist Blockchain Technologies
Networks Department

T +31 (0)88 866 70 78
M +31 (0)65 191 49 18
E oskar.vandeventer@...

Location

 

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.

 

 

 
1 - 2 of 2